'86 was a very good year...
'85 was the worst year for those of us old enough to regard Jack Clark as their favorite all-time Giant, but '86 brought me back just when I was about to give up for good. "How 'bout them kids!" and "Humm Baby" were on t-shirts everywhere. Will, Robby, The Tin Man & The Hack-Man got the Giants back over .500 and everyone just knew it was just the beginning.
This is what this year needs to be like. Keep it simple and let the kids play. Take it in the shorts for a year.
Do something small to fill the 3b void until Villalona gets here like Lowry, Hennessey, and maybe Marcus Sanders to the Rockies for Stewart and Fuentes. Trade Durham to someone for a sippy-cup and let Velez play second.
Let's see what Schierholtz, Ortmeier, Velez, and Stewart could come up with...
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
Re: '86 was a very good year...
I'm pretty sure he's not going to sit back and let the kids play because the average fan is not going to be happy to watch a losing team. He has to do something to show the fans that the Giants could possibly be competitive (like Zito last offseason). Remember all of the misguided hope last offseason? I think the Zito move accounted for a lot of that.
As much as I'd like to see Schierholz, Frandsen, Sanchez, and maybe Ortmeier get a chance to show what they can do, I'm pretty sure Sabean is going to have to make some kind of splash this offseason to keep the fanbase happy.
Re: '86 was a very good year...
If you're trying to compare the current batch of prospects to Clark and company, not so much.
Re: '86 was a very good year...
All kidding aside, I'd like to give the kids an opportunity to fight for a job.
by SoFa King Mike on Dec 6, 2007 8:18 AM PST up reply actions

by 




















