McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona

A nice little gift from Mr. John Sickels over at Minor League Ball.

Angel Villalona, 3B, San Francisco Giants
Bats: R    Throws: R     HT: 6-3     WT: 210    DOB: August 13, 1990

OK, first I have to get something out of the way. I get email from Giants fans asking me why I don't rate Villalona as among the top ten prospects in baseball. One email went so far as to say he was the best prospect in the game, and that I was a moron for not admitting that. I think what is happening here is that Giants fans are so hungry for a young impact hitter that they are falling head-over-heels for Villanona a bit earlier than they should. Please, don't listen to media propaganda. Just look at the facts yourself. Villalona is just 17 years old. He's huge, big, strong, muscular. He should hit for great power in the future, but right now his strike zone judgment is very mediocre. This is not a damning flaw by any means. He's just 17, he has time to figure that out, but he needs to do it. His defense is also an issue, and he is unpolished in most non-hitting phases of the game. There is also concern that his body may max out at a young age, and that he will add fat, not muscle, as he gets older. Now this may sound like I am denigrating Villalona. I am not. Far from it. He IS one of the best power-hitting prospects in the game, and a year from now he will probably be in the top twenty overall. But he is not Albert Pujols or Miguel Cabrera yet. He is not in the Jay Bruce or Justin Upton or Colby Rasmus category yet. Even at his best, he won't be a complete player, lacking the defense and speed to be a Seven Skill guy. This doesn't mean he can't be a terrific slugger, an All-Star, or MVP candidate down the line, but we need to take it easy and not create unrealistic expectations just yet. Let's give the kid some time to get used to North America, to figure out the strike zone, to polish up his defense. Understand that a Grade B+ is extremely high praise for a player in rookie ball. Settle down, enjoy the show, it should be interesting.

Happy New Years, Giants fans!

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs | Comment 11 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
I agree with what Sickels' is saying here. He certainly doesn't have numbers yet where you compare him to other stud minor leaguers.  On the other hand, the same thing Sickels' is saying about  Angel's size is what they said about Lebron James when he was in high school. That age is the key though. While he didn't burn up the rookie league, I doubt those other guys could have accomplished what he did at just 17 years old.
Bring me a cleanup hitter please!!

by rxmeister on Dec 31, 2007 7:55 PM PST   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
I'm embarrassed that Giants fans are apparently sending him e-mails like that! D:
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Dec 31, 2007 8:17 PM PST   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Yeah that's a pretty unfair expectation for a kid that age.  You can't say he's the best prospect yet because he hasn't had enough time around the minors to really prove he is the best prospect in the game, but he really does have the potential.  Anything could happen to him to make him not reach his full potential, so until he makes it to Class A+ or maybe AA we shouldn't get our hopes that high up.  But a B+ is a pretty damn good grade for a kid who hasn't even played a full season of pro ball.

by boonitez on Dec 31, 2007 8:54 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Same here. While I can't even read MinorLeagueBall.com anymore because the commenters drive me up the GD wall, John Sickels' stuff is consistently aces. For him to give a B+ to a 17 year old kid speaks volumes.
Democracy is lovely but baseball is more mature. BVCE supports Manny Burriss and SF Dugout.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 31, 2007 8:59 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Given the relative undevelopment of a seventeen year old physiology , how can Sickels make such a pointed assessment of Villalona's speed potential? His body won't reach its growth potential until his twenties , imagine the conditioning that could take place in that timespan...
Rockies juggernaut rolls o...ver , dead. NL West TempestTeapot CASE IN POINT!

by victor frankenstein on Jan 1, 2008 10:37 AM PST   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Growth max , not potential.
Rockies juggernaut rolls o...ver , dead. NL West TempestTeapot CASE IN POINT!

by victor frankenstein on Jan 1, 2008 10:39 AM PST   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
He should wait until he's 18 until he's a show-er...
Democracy is lovely but baseball is more mature. BVCE supports Manny Burriss and SF Dugout.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jan 1, 2008 12:57 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Errr... not to let the cat out of the bag... but it just doesn't work that way. You're really either one or the other, and you find out which around the time you're 10-14, depending.

Well, you don't, Baron, but us "danglers" (to use Mogggee's term) do.

He is Vengeance. He is the Knight. He is Dave Righetti. PRAY TO HIM! / Also, my blog. For writers.

by howtheyscored on Jan 1, 2008 2:23 PM PST to parent up   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
Great comment by John, and it couldn't be more on-point.

When it comes to certain publications overrating a player, Giants fans need to be reminded of two words: Jesse Foppert.

SFDugout.com - Returning Offseason 2007

by BruteSentiment on Jan 1, 2008 2:12 PM PST   0 recs

Re: John Sickels' Take on Angel Villalona
i think Sickels nailed it....who in the hell knows what Villalona will be, long way to go..

love that part about some kool-aid drinker emailing
him, calling him a moron "for not admitting that
Villalona is the best prospect in the game", lol..

by slojoe on Jan 2, 2008 4:10 PM PST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The20catch20part202_small
OT: Qualifications of a Superhero
Grant_small
Cantu trade? Howry signing?
Hb307-1_small
McCovey Chronicles Community Prospect List #14
Xanthan_small
Arb-Status for Potential Free Agents
Small
The Big Unit?

Recent FanPosts

Small
I give up being a Giants fan-turn to Red Sox
Hb307-1_small
McCovey Chronicles Community Prospect List #15
Ucla_small
Keith Law on the Renteria signing
A_small
im noticing a trend
Small
Renteria signing is a done deal
Small
Food for thought...
Lucy_liu_33_small
Sabathia, Teixeira or Ramirez?
Centipete_rose_small
Exclusive STATS interview and a plea for help

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Grant_small Grant

Moderators

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Poopcat_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

ad

Site Meter