It's been mentioned a couple of times on the site that we fared better without Bonds in the line up than with him this year. I have no idea if that's true and, if so, whether the right metric is win/loss percentage or average runs scored. Still, it's counterintuitive and it's a lot more encouraging than hearing we did much worse without him in the line up. I'd be really interested to see some analysis from those of you who are deft with stats that breaks down how we did without him and which lineups actually fared the best.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
There are 70 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.