Question about PEDs
In light of the Mitchell Report's imminent release, maybe you guys could help me suss some things out re: PED use.
Specifically, just what are PEDs? Is it just an umbrella term for HGH and steroids, or is there some nuance I'm missing? I've even read somewhere that the term "Performance-enhancing drugs" isn't even a legitimate legal term. How accurate is that, for you lawyer types out there?
And supposing that it is true, are there different punishments for HGH use/distribution and steroid use/distribution?
Thanks in advance. I figure you all are a much better resource for this sort of stuff than yahoo answers or fluther.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
2 comments
Comments
Re: Question about PEDs
What the MLB owners and the Player's Union negotiate in their collective bargaining agreement is entirely different, and obviously the penalties are set out in that agreement, as well as a grievance procedure to resolve disputes on the matter.
PED is a term (including much more than steroids and HGH) used by sports authorities, not the government. The Feds, the State, or the local cops don't care why one is using a drug or what kind of boost they give to a person's athletic "performance;" they just want to know if you possess them legally - as in, if a drug is a controlled substance under the law, do you have the right to have it?
I'm sure we have a few lawyers here that can point you to the laws themselves.
by Sayhey on Dec 13, 2007 12:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Question about PEDs
by EliminateMe on Dec 13, 2007 9:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















