Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
NYN close to signing Yorvit Torreabla.
The plan is to pair him up with Ramon Castro, to replace the previously unreplacable Paul "Heart, Soul, and Godamned Guts of a Hero" Lo Duca.
I take a morbid fascination with Yorvit's career, because of my fixation on the question, if only Sabes has made him the starter during the 2004-05 season. Maybe Sabes can go for a repeat performance, and trade Misch, Sanchez, and Wilson for Ron Belliard, so I can develop a similar fascination with Fransden's future adventures.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
39 comments
Comments
Great!
by wilriv21 on Nov 14, 2007 5:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by SnowLeopard on Nov 14, 2007 5:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by thehavenot on Nov 14, 2007 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by SnowLeopard on Nov 14, 2007 6:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by rxmeister on Nov 14, 2007 6:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
And I'm not sure ANY high-priced free agent is truly worth the money anymore.
If Yorvit's shoulder heals enough for him to throw as he once did, he could easily be one of the best defensive catchers in the league.
Hitting-wise, I have no idea why pitchers throw him fastballs in the zone once they get ahead of him. He can hit the fastball -- but he's not very good on curve balls.
by sharksrog on Nov 14, 2007 10:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
> this past season.
Yorvit's career line is .251/.313/.391. Baseball Prospectus gives him a translated line (based on nuetralizing year-by-year park effects) of .246/.310/.390. The MLB-wide aggregate line for all catchers in 07 was .255/.321/.393. So, at the plate, compared with an "average catcher", per every 100 AB, two singles are replaced by a double for Yorvit. Big whoop.
Add to that some great defense (recent shoulder/throwing problems notwithstanding), the fact that 05-07 were his peak (age 26-28) years, and the fact that his total MLB salary so far has averaged out to ~$600K/yr, and, yeah, I'll take it. Sure beats the alternatives we've paid through the nose for.
> 3 yrs 15 million dollars.
That is crazy, though.
> My Giant memories of Yorvit are dominated by
> that bad throw he made that cost us a key game
> against the Padres in 2004, and getting pancaked
> by Pudge in the 2003 playoffs, allowing Pudge
> to score and the runner behind him.
Ah the Brian Sabean method of player evaluation - did the guy (Jose Cruz Jr, Joe Nathan, Dustin Mohr, Cody Ransom) fuck up big in the offseason or the last few games of the regular season - then OFF WITH HIM.
by SnowLeopard on Nov 15, 2007 12:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
Or, look: it's a little less than what Bengie Molina is getting. Using their career numbers, Molina contributes about 3 runs more than Yorvit over the course of a season (120 games for catchers). Since Yorvit is much faster and more mobile, he almost certainly makes those runs back on the bases and behind the plate.
by Evan on Nov 15, 2007 8:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 11:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
Here's a good (though kind of technical) post about measuring catcher defense by a Reds blogger. It's just a start, of course. For what it's worth, he has Torrealba as a little above average, Molina and Pierzynski as a little below.
by Evan on Nov 15, 2007 12:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by rxmeister on Nov 15, 2007 6:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
And Herges was also on the team in 2003, before the Pierzynski trade. He became closer because of the Pierzynski trade (and because Worrell went to Philly in 2004), but he would have been a Giant regardless.
And Morris was signed before the 2006 season. Liriano (if that is what you are intimating) didn't come up until midway through 2006 so I don't see any correlation there.
by thehavenot on Nov 14, 2007 10:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
Nonetheless, the central point still stands - we could have saved a lot of money had Sabes just made Torrealba starting catcher in the 04-05 offseason, and that money could have gone towards an 100 RBI guy to bat behind Bonds.
by SnowLeopard on Nov 15, 2007 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by thehavenot on Nov 15, 2007 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
Incidentally, the 16 passed balls Bengie Molina had last season are five more than Yorvit has in his entire career. And Bengie is a former Gold Glover.
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by rxmeister on Nov 15, 2007 6:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by Evan on Nov 15, 2007 8:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
For instance, Mike Matheny was considered to be one of the best catchers to throw to. But in his five seasons prior to joining the Gianta, his catchers' ERA was just slightly higher than that of his reserve catchers during that time.
Mark thinks that people who understand stats don't understand intangibles. He apparently doesn't realize that a VP of the company I worked for and I were trying to analyze how team chemistry could be applied to the work place over 30 years ago.
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by rxmeister on Nov 16, 2007 5:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
Catchers are so different from players at all the other positions. They spend a lot less time on the field, they get injured more, they develop late, they seem to be especially prone to inconsistency and fluke years and sample-size weirdness, and the single most important contribution they make to a team (handling pitchers) is basically unknowable and unmeasurable.
It's just too hard to figure out how valuable they are. So I would treat them as more-or-less replacable parts. Don't spend money or trade capital on the likes of Yorvit or AJ or Matheny or Molina or Kendall or etc. If you take a flyer in the draft and happen to come up with a good catcher (Russell Martin, 17th round! Jorge Posada, 24th round!), that's great. If not, just sign two or three of the best backups or minor-league free agents you can find, and hope for the best. And pinch-hit for them liberally.
by Evan on Nov 16, 2007 9:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by rxmeister on Nov 16, 2007 9:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
> valuable they are. So I would treat
> them as more-or-less replacable parts.
> Don't spend money or trade capital on
> the likes of Yorvit or AJ or Matheny
> or Molina or Kendall or etc.
Well put - I agree 100%. Which is why, when you have a young, cost-controlled catcher with a good defensive rep and who pitchers seem fine with and who is OK at the plate, like the Giants did in Torrealba at the time that Santiago left, it's probably a good idea to give the guy the starting job, and devote your free-agent signing and trade resources on improving other positions.
by SnowLeopard on Nov 16, 2007 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
So I'd think if you have a young staff, have a veteran catcher with a young backup. If you have a more veteran staff, a younger catcher is fine with a veteran behind him.
by JRPhillips on Nov 16, 2007 2:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by sharksrog on Nov 16, 2007 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
by krazybalr on Nov 15, 2007 9:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Great!
But the rest of this decade surely looks horrid, and the beginning of next may start out a little slowly, as well.
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by howtheyscored on Nov 15, 2007 1:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by JRPhillips on Nov 15, 2007 9:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
I love his defense and the way he works with his pitchers. Just how good history will prove him to be we'll know more about in three or four years. But I think there is little doubt that had the Giants given Yorvit more of a chance and instead worked on improving other positions, they likely would have been a better team from 2004 through 2007.
I will sacrifice that for having a high enough draft pick to sign Tim Lincecum, but it is hard to say precisely how far Tim would have fallen. Many scouts were afraid to take a chance on a little guy with a motion they didn't understand. Most preferred to take the "safe" route.
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by rxmeister on Nov 15, 2007 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by sharksrog on Nov 15, 2007 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
I think the Giants would have been a MUCH better team had they not made the Pierzynski trade. It's incredible contemplating the disastrous effects of that one single move. Nathan, of course, became a fantastic closer. The Giants haven't had anyone even remotely close to him since. Not only that, but the Giants spent more than 20million dollars on that one guy who used to smirk when he gave up homeruns. I forget his name. Please don't remind me. Liriano and/or Bonser could have been traded for an actual middle of the lineup hitter. The 20 million for Smirkey McDidmyjob could have gone towards something nice. And...AH!!!!!!!! I can not contemplate it any more!
Okay, maybe a little more, my biggest disappointment stemming from recent Sabean moves involves thinking about Wilson, Accardo and Nathan in the 7th, 8th and 9th.
by thehavenot on Nov 15, 2007 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by rxmeister on Nov 16, 2007 5:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
I will say this, however. The Giants could improve their record next season even without improving their team. I truly believe they were a bit better team than their record showed in 2007.
by sharksrog on Nov 16, 2007 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
by sharksrog on Nov 16, 2007 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
Anyways, so yeah, then there's Mike Matheny's salary. That could have gone towards something better.
by thehavenot on Nov 16, 2007 3:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
I think Brian undervalues OBP and overvalues experience, particularly experienced mediocrity.
by sharksrog on Nov 17, 2007 4:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mets Close to Signing Yorvit
They tried to do that last offseason, and Sabes couldn't even do that right. :(
by SnowLeopard on Nov 18, 2007 7:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs



















