Same 'ol subject, new angle.
Being as this is the eleventy-billionth A-Rod thread let me make this quick.
We need to sign A-Rod so he doesn't go to LA.
Thoughts?
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
41 comments
Comments
Don't worry,
"We haven't talked about it, but I certainly wouldn't close the door as far as listening to him and taking a look and seeing," Torre said before the annual gala for his Safe at Home Foundation, a charity devoted to curbing domestic violence. "He'd have to relocate, and I'm not sure if he's into that."
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2007 9:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't worry,
by nick on Nov 10, 2007 11:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't worry,
Sorry, I just can't contain my laughter right now. So Joe Torre will be just as much an enabler for Ned Colletti as Bruce is for Sabes!
"You know what, Ned? We don't need ARod. BERNIE is available!"
by JRPhillips on Nov 12, 2007 9:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by Grant on Nov 10, 2007 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by mxmob33 on Nov 10, 2007 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by mxmob33 on Nov 12, 2007 7:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
IB4 RAINMAN
by jponry on Nov 10, 2007 9:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sigh.....
by PacBellBoozer on Nov 10, 2007 9:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by ACgiant87 on Nov 10, 2007 10:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by Mark carry on on Nov 10, 2007 10:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new (d)angle.
by victor frankenstein on Nov 10, 2007 11:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by rxmeister on Nov 10, 2007 11:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by Moderation on Nov 10, 2007 11:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Do you have numbers for this?
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2007 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OUTRAGE!
by Mark carry on on Nov 10, 2007 12:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well it's fun to tease
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2007 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Do you have numbers for this?
by Nathan on Nov 10, 2007 1:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Do you have numbers for this?
Loney, LaRoche and Kershaw would definately get me thinking about doing it.
by thehavenot on Nov 10, 2007 1:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Do you have numbers for this?
by Nathan on Nov 10, 2007 1:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Do you have numbers for this?
by Moderation on Nov 10, 2007 2:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Em, I asked for the numbers
By revenues, they were also 4th behind the Yanks, Sox and Mets.
By operating income, they were 2nd behind the Marlins.
Well on one side we have a poster attempting to be snarky. On the other side we have Forbes. I'm going with Forbes here.
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2007 11:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
3b is a next priority
by wilriv21 on Nov 10, 2007 1:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
The circumstances being 1. Colletti 2. Our rebuilding 3. The Dodgers desire for a pitcher
I really don't think that Lowry for something good from the Dodgers is completely out of the picture.
by thehavenot on Nov 10, 2007 1:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
*Phase I was the signing of savvy vets with good speed and defense to block good young prospects. Phase II was the apparent willingness of LA to take our useless parts off our hands in return for low level minor leaguers a la Sweeney for Denker.
by Smoke on the Water on Nov 10, 2007 2:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by rxmeister on Nov 10, 2007 7:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by thehavenot on Nov 10, 2007 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
You might want to cross off the possibility that A-ROD will be coming to the Giants if what I read in the NY Daily news (Bill Madden article) is true. I was not aware of the fact that the Giants "have two more years remaining on the revenue-sharing subsidy they get for building their new stadium. Once that's up, they go from payees to payers."
by Buzzword on Nov 11, 2007 7:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by BawLa on Nov 11, 2007 9:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by Bhaakon on Nov 11, 2007 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by BawLa on Nov 11, 2007 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by Bhaakon on Nov 11, 2007 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by rxmeister on Nov 11, 2007 4:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same 'ol subject, new angle.
by giantsrainman on Nov 11, 2007 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Payments
by DrBGiantsfan on Nov 11, 2007 9:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Payments
by rxmeister on Nov 12, 2007 5:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Payments
by Roger on Nov 12, 2007 10:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Payments
by howtheyscored on Nov 12, 2007 10:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Payments
by howtheyscored on Nov 12, 2007 10:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















