Okay, this is for reals....

You were up to 22 votes (43% of votes cast) just a few minutes ago.  Do these other sites know who they are up against? Go Grant!!

Why did I do such a thing?  Because his is the only blog that has remained readable since...2002?  2003?  Whenever it was that I started reading it.  Waiting for Boof I think it was called.

Or I'm a lemming.

Except now I'm moving in with you, and you have to clothe me and feed me. I can wash myself most of the time. That's just the price you pay for winning my Savings.

Seriously though I voted for you because A) you're the only person I have heard of on that list, 2) you're a good writer and stuff so you deserve it, and iii) as a fellow poor working college student who has had to support herself throughout this entire laborious process, I really want you to get a break, because you need it. May this forward me some good karma to get free money for university later, too.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/10/vote-for-mccove.html

Go Grant!

Where did you hear about this contest, on the back of a book of matches?

But somebody else has to do it. I haven't honestly flamed since I was a freshman, and if I hop off the wagon now there's going to be an intervention. And I hate interventions. You could say I'm addicted to not having them.

But seriously, we have to close the online voting gap!

At least when Grant whines about not having enough money, he does it with style.  So he gets my vote.

Have these other competitors even tried a Choose Your Own Adventure entry, or gone the Littlefield vs. Sabean route?  I doubt it.

But this way sure is easier. Score one for the web and online voting.

If this is ingenuous, I certainly don't encourage it because I don't want to take a legitimately consequential vote lightly, but I'm not really well versed in the ethics of a webvote so I don't really know if it would be right or wrong (happy to be schooled, though). It's there, though.

For shame, for shame...