MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Bowker and Romo and the organizational batter and pitcher of the year. Pretty positive review of the Giants' system.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
"So can be play 3B?"
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Spelling is evil.
by UnleashTheGore on Oct 3, 2007 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by southcitysteve on Oct 3, 2007 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Again, I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding his move to the outfield. This is just my speculation on the situation.
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by Mark carry on on Oct 3, 2007 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 3, 2007 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by howtheyscored on Oct 3, 2007 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 3, 2007 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by howtheyscored on Oct 3, 2007 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 3, 2007 3:28 PM PDT reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by NearestNorwich on Oct 3, 2007 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
For a 14th round guy in his second full year of pro ball, third year overall, I think he's doing a pretty decent job. I think he'll be in the CT rotation in 08.
I didn't go to any San Jose games this year. I have not seen Martinez pitch. Besides, I'm not sure I could give much of a scouting report on pitches because my eyesight is so terrible. I'd need to be standing right next to Martinez or catching him myself to tell what he throws.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 3, 2007 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 4, 2007 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
How many people here would trade Velez for Brian Buscher straight up?
I think I would, as it would mean I wouldn't have to watch Feliz hit anymore.
Buscher vs Velez
Maybe we all get too impatient with these guys? John Bowker is another guy who looked for all the world like he wasn't going anywhere and then broke out this year in CT of all places. Ortmeier is another guy I left off my Giants Top 50 completely and look what he accomplished this year. On the other hand, how many prospects who backslide in their progress recover to have a meaningful MLB career? Not very many.
In short, I think Velez was a good pickup. He's not the reason we let Buscher go. We should have kept Buscher another season.
Re: Buscher vs Velez
by Grant Brisbee on Oct 3, 2007 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Buscher vs Velez
Anyone have any info on rule 5 players eligible who could be potential difference makers? And when does the 2007 Minor League Free Agent list come out? I've been looking apparently its not set yet.
by April3rdLifeBegins on Oct 4, 2007 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Buscher vs Velez
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/profile?playerId=28837
I'm not upset about losing Buscher in the Rule 5. He honestly gave the Giants no reason to protect him at any point. If he turns into something, bully for him, but I don't think the Giants made the wrong decision. He's had one good year, so that could be as much a fluke as anything.
Velez, meanwhile, has had two good years and a much more solid major league debut. I'll keep Velez, TYVM.
by BruteSentiment on Oct 4, 2007 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Buscher vs Velez
Re: Buscher vs Velez
He batting .259/.321/.366 over 130 games for Connecticut i 2006, with 23 doubles, 3 triples and 7 home run and with 39 walks and 75 strikeouts in 467 at bats.
by BruteSentiment on Oct 4, 2007 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=613
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
Romo had a great year, but I'd give it to Pucetas. This isn't a prospect thing, it's performance, and Pucetas led all of (qualified) organized baseball in ERA as a starter. Romo missed a good part of the year and was a reliever, and not even a closer until later in the season.
Don't get me wrong, Romo had a huge year, but Pucetas' was huger.
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
also, i agree.
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Oct 4, 2007 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
by norcalalways on Oct 4, 2007 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: MILB Giants '07 Organizational Review
But the Giants moved Nate from third to right, just as they did three decades earlier with Jack Clark, another who apparently couldn't handle the hot corner.
My question for Brute would be this: Is there a reason why Nate couldn't have been converted back to catcher to take advantage of his fine arm and his lefthanded bat, a rarity among catchers?

by 


















