Title
The eternal disclaimer: My playing days and my shaving days intersected only briefly. So when I write something like "I believe the idea of a `closer's mentality' is a myth", take it with the grain of salt that the closest I've come to a major league clubhouse was on photo day in 1985. But I've always been skeptical of the idea there exists mystical closer-fu that's gained from pulling some sword from a stone.
I've decided there's qualification needed for this idea, though. It is entirely plausible, if not likely, there are pitchers who lack the mental toughness to close baseball games in the major leagues. I can concede that. Maybe there are a few, or maybe there are a whole bunch. We'll just never be able to spot them. The difference between Closer X and Closer Y could be that Closer Y doesn't have the "closer's mentality". But it might be that Closer X has allowed four home runs and eight balls fouled straight back to the screen, while Closer Y has allowed 12 home runs. How can you separate mental failings from blind luck over just 70 innings? It seems both illogical and unfair to start dragging perceived character flaws into the ring when the sample size is so minute. Another difference would be that Closer X would probably have a mask and maybe fight crime when he wasn't playing baseball, because that's just a super cool name.
But this doesn't really apply to Armando Benitez, because that dude just stinks. While watching some of the games after coming back from vacation, I was starting to think about a pro-Armando column. As in, the guy blew eleventy-five saves in a row, he knows his own family probably wouldn't trust him to save a seat in a crowded movie theater, yet he was still able to crank out a 1-2-3 inning against San Diego. He never became likable, but you could almost respect the focus he had after such a rough stretch.
A closer look at even his successful outings are discouraging, though. I can't remember watching a pitcher hang so many pitches. Every other breaking ball seems to die about thirty feet from the plate. For every vintage splitter, there's a tetherball slowly curling up the middle of the zone. The fastball is average. The command is seriously lacking. In every appearance, someone from the opposing team will get a fat pitch to hit. Rod Beck in the twilight of his career was like that. Of course, Beck's elbow was just a fleshy pouch filled with wet circus peanuts at that point, so the comparison isn't fair. If a team doesn't score against Benitez, it's because of their own failings. I've never felt that way about a closer before, at least not to extent that I do with Mando.
I really have been fair with Benitez, and refused to pile on with anything more than the occasional cheeky attempt at visual humor. But last night was the final straw. A four-run lead, three outs, and he couldn't do it. The hits weren't all solid, but he mixed a pointless walk in for good measure. I don't know if this is a case of Benitez not fooling anyone, or a case of Benitez lacking the moon rocks to close a big league ballgame these days. I don't really care, either. The guy has to go. I've supported him with my silence long enough. Booo. Booooooo. Boooooooooo. I give up, and while I don't think I'm the only one who held out this long, it isn't hard to admit that I was wrong.
Which brings us to a comment starter: How does he go? Could the Giants expect anything back if they ate his contract? Is the only way out to just release him?
Edit: All bets are off if he can get his fastball up to 97, as he did today. Where in the heck has that fastball been?
0 recs |
73 comments
Comments
dump him
ok the point is, maybe Armando could still be good, but it will never work with the Giants. This relationship is broken beyond repair. Cite irreconcialable differences and cut the tie. Eat the money, whatever. Even if he finds success elsewhere, it's ok, because he's spoiling the whole thing. I truly think that the whole team is suffering - it's a mental game and nobody can think healthy thoughts when he's on the mound.
Tonight he came in with a 4 run lead and my mom left the room because she couldn't stand to watch him pitch. This is coming from a woman who would routinely bring a book when the family would go to games when we were kids. If that doesn't show that he's causing problems, I don't know what will.
by wjackalope on Aug 23, 2006 12:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: dump him
Are we long lost brothers, because I have the same mom!
by Giant Fan in Singapore on Aug 23, 2006 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
Financially, the team has to think about keeping him next year or finding a team desperate/dumb/both enough to cut a trade for at least an undisclosed draft pick dependent on performance, while we still have to eat probably half or half+ of the contract.
Ideally, I suppose, that trade would happen. But I have the most assured feeling (as in intuition, not reason) that it won't, in which case the best thing for the team - cap finances aside - would be to dump him outright and eat what we must.
by howtheyscored on Aug 23, 2006 1:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Keep Him
We aren't going to get anything for him. We're still going to have to pay him. There's no obvious pitcher that we just have to get on the roster. Mando got run out of NY a couple of years ago under amost the exact same circumstances. The next year he saved 49 games for Florida. If he keeps stinking it up into next season, then release him.
by DrBGiantsfan on Aug 23, 2006 6:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Keep Him
It's easy to fall into a trap of feeling like something (or someone) needs to be used just because a lot of money was sunk into it/them, but the fact is that the cost is sunk, and sometimes it's just time to take the loss and move on.
At this point, I'd probably just keep him for the rest of the season and pretty much not let him pitch much at all, and then try to trade him in the off-season...
by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Aug 23, 2006 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Keep Him

by EliminateMe on Aug 23, 2006 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
I was awake for almost all of the game last night, but during the commercial break between the 8th and 9th I fell into a slumber. It must not have been that deep since I dreamed Mando lost the game by throwing a grounder into right field.
When I woke up a few minutes after the game ended the only clue it was a dream was that the D-backs won the game in walk-off fashion.
While we certainly won't be able to get a top-prospect, we could probably get a good 4th outfielder or utilityman. Teams will always be willing to trade for "proven" closers in January.
To continue the abused wife metaphor: The same woman will pick up a different guy with a similar history because she thinks she can fix him.
Maybe Cleveland or Cincy will think that Mando's problem can be cured by the Ohio air.
by noahthek on Aug 23, 2006 6:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mando Must Go.
That did it. The fans HATE him. When was the last time a Giant was this disliked by the SF Faithful?
The only way he should stay is if he agrees to start coming out of the bullpen wearing the Crazy Crab suit.
by SFG on Aug 23, 2006 8:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Crazy Crab
by Natto on Aug 23, 2006 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mando Must Go.
AJ?
by wjackalope on Aug 23, 2006 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mando Must Go.
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mando Must Go.
Jeff Brantley was also booed when he was our closer. And he was basically run out of town only to succeed in Cincy.
I'm very impressed that Brantley doesn't hold anything but the highest esteem for the SF fanbase (and he still hates the Dodgers). I remember when he was talking about getting booed he said something, "I wasn't doing my job. I deserved the boos and if I were paying to see me play, I'd probably have booed too."
In ten years Mando will probably still be questioning Omar's defensive positioning.
by noahthek on Aug 23, 2006 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Mando Must Go.
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cubs
The only downside is that keeps him in the NL, where he has the potential to bite us 12 times/season (screw us 6, help the LA Dogsmackers 6). Sending him to the AL would be much better. We all know how these things work out. We might be able to get one or two mid-level prospects out of the deal, since Mando technically has a big-league arm.
I couldn't believe the box score this morning. I wanted to throw the paper when I saw what he did.
by SmokinZBT on Aug 23, 2006 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Cubs
by thegiantsrj00r0x0r on Aug 23, 2006 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Cubs
by Natto on Aug 23, 2006 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
September
In September GM's get antsy as they approach the playoffs and they'll go for anyone they think might even have a moderately positive impact. Especially pitchers -- Ponson anyone?
We should give Benitez chances to get into better form, some nice 7th and 8th inning low-pressure appearances. Then a month from now sell him to a team with World Series hopes and a deep farm system (I'm looking at you St. Louis) and get the best prospects we can.
If Sabes waits until the offseason or Spring Training to try and work a deal we'll be in a much much worse position.
by SFG on Aug 23, 2006 8:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
good idea but
by wjackalope on Aug 23, 2006 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: good idea but
I think it was 2002 when we got back Bill Mueller for nothing in September, along with Doug Henry, or some reliever like that. But we couldn't use either of them in the playoffs.
by groug on Aug 23, 2006 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
This year, he is 1.54 and .258, very close to the bottom of the league in both categories. Only two closers have higher WHIPs and only four have higher BAAs.
In short, he's having the worst year of his career and just about the worst year of any closer in baseball. His "low" ERA (until last night) was purely a mirage.
Mando has always walked way too many guys, even in his best years. But he made up for it by not allowing many hits. Now he's giving up walks AND hits. A bad combo.
Mando has always had troubles from the neck up. Now he's having problems from the neck down as well. Another bad combo.
I suppose it's within the realm of possibility that he could rebound and have another good year in him like 2004. But at 34, the odds are diminishing.
The only salvation for Mando would be if he developed into a "crafty" closer like Hoffman, Beck, Worrell in 2003, etc. But that would require him to use his smarts---something that appears to be in limited supply with Mando.
There is no good solution to Mando. He wouldn't bring much if anything in return, if we could unload him at all. There are 16-20 teams that have excellent, or at least serviceable, closers right now---although some are getting long in the tooth, like Hoffman, Gordon, Rivera, Isringhausen, Ryan.
Giants look to be b/w a rock and a hard place for the next year or two in terms of closers. Since there is a limited supply of "proven" closers and many on the verge of retirement, the Giants will need to develop someone on their own, like Rodriguez (LAA), Papelbon (BOS), Ray (BAL), Street (OAK), Otsuka (TEX), Putz (SEA), Fuentes (COL), Gonzalez (PITT), Saito (LAD).
Either that, or trade for a setup guy who could move into the closer role: Rodney (DET), Wheeler (HOU), Howry (CHI), Nelson (KC), Soriano (SEA), Gaudin (OAK), Zumaya (DET), Hancock (STL).
The best shot they had to develop a closer was Accardo, which makes the Hindenberg trade looks more foolish by the millisecond.
Prognosis for 2007: not good. Looks like a year of closer-by-committee unless/until one of the young guys emerges from the pack.
by leewhee on Aug 23, 2006 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Otsuka
Otherwise good points, and I think we now have to hope Wilson becomes our home-grown closer.
by wjackalope on Aug 23, 2006 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Otsuka
Guess I wasn't necessarily focusing on "home grown" so much as pointing out that many teams have "developed" guys into the closer role as opposed to getting a "proven" guy via trade or FA. (Sorry about the plethora of "quotes" but I don't know how to create itals.)
Otsuka is 34 and was a closer in Japan. He was used as a setup guy in San Diego and the Rangers got him in that big trade with Eaton and turned him into a closer. So far, so good. Otsuka has a WHIP of 1.00 and a BAA of .225. Strikes out 4x as many as he BBs.
This shows that, instead of paying bazillions for a proven closer, many teams have gotten creative---either thru home-growing a prospect into the role or acquiring a guy who can slide into the closer role.
The Giants took the "easy" way out with "proven" Blownitez, paid the big bucks, and got burned bad. A little creativity would go a long, long, long way with the Giants right now. Now that they've backed themselves into a corner roster-wise, they really have no other choice at this point.
by leewhee on Aug 23, 2006 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
by positiveuphemism on Aug 23, 2006 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe Sabean is dyslexic
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
I think Grant summed it up nicely with "If a team doesn't score against Benitez, it's because of their own failings."
I do think he's somewhat tradeable still. Combine his career saves with the fact that he's throwing mid-90's again and will be on the last year of his contract, and I think some team will take a chance on him. The Giants shouldn't expect anything valuable in return though.
by mxmob33 on Aug 23, 2006 9:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
by leftymalo on Aug 23, 2006 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
The Giants should make that happen, with them as the parents and Mando as the kid. That's right. If it takes moving the franchise back to Candlestick for a year to get rid of the guy, DO IT.
by Skaldheim on Aug 23, 2006 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
I'm trying to think of someone out there as unwanted as Benetiez is here. Perhaps Shawn Green after this season, when Lastings Milledge is ready to start in RF...think the Mets might want Mando back? (ha ha)
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 9:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
From Cooperstown
[IMG]http://i8.tinypic.com/25f6ayt.jpg[/IMG]
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 9:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
<img src="blah blah">
They didn't happen to have a list of career blown saves leaders, though, did they?
by EliminateMe on Aug 23, 2006 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We ain't no simple phpBB board here...
by WalrusMan on Aug 23, 2006 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: We ain't no simple phpBB board here...
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It worked for me...
by WalrusMan on Aug 23, 2006 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
by rcrusoe on Aug 23, 2006 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: From Cooperstown
The save's overvalued reputation forces managers to leave lousy pitchers with large career save totals in the game to lose close games. In the Giant's case, howver, it still leads back to Sabean buying high on Benitez's contract as the root of the problem.
The solution? Get rid of him at any cost. Josh from the Thrill had the best analogy. If the U.S. wasted billions on a bad defense system, are they going to rely on it, because it cost so much money, or are they going to scrap it for the a safer system?
by GiantJim on Aug 23, 2006 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ditto the Save Hatin'!
We should declare formal war on the Save statistic.
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Ditto the Save Hatin'!
I guess the idea is that if you've invested a lot of good money to protect something very valuable (supposedly a late inning lead), but you are going to lose your valuables unless you scrap that investment for another, you should just go ahead and make the new investment.
by GiantJim on Aug 23, 2006 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Ditto the Save Hatin'!
You are right.
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Ditto the Save Hatin'!
by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Aug 23, 2006 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Ditto the Save Hatin'!
by Pants Man on Aug 23, 2006 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
by WithTechron on Aug 23, 2006 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
My hopes for getting rid of The Fat One are:
- We swap one unwanted contract for another (e.g., Alfonzo for Finley -- still can't believe ANYONE wanted Alfonzo)
- Benitez has a hot streak early next year. Some poor GM thinks "maybe he's turned the corner" (and that GM is not named Brian Sabean). Giants unload. In future visits to AT&T Park, Benitez is treated like the red-headed stepchild of the Kent family.
by War on Aug 23, 2006 9:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
The bad contract swap should be considered too, as well as the Livan Hernandez approach: trade a well-known veteran, receive a journeyman reliever in return, and pay the veteran's entire salary because your fan base just can't look at the guy anymore.
This wasn't exactly Sabean's finest moment, but it would appear like he's being backed into a similar corner.
by Pants Man on Aug 23, 2006 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
by Kitspool on Aug 23, 2006 10:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm More Concerned About Attitude Than Performance
"I did my job", says Armando, well the team lost and it is not always because someone kicked a ground ball. The incessant 3 ball counts, gopher balls and disdain for just being a teammate are not acceptable.
Do NOT DFA him, we cant afford to eat the remainder of his contract. While I still think he is a usable part of the bullpen Felipe should pick and choose his use. This winter they could move him on the cheap (bet we will eat some salary) but at least we will not have to hear "I did my job" any more.
by wilriv21 on Aug 23, 2006 10:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Assuming that we're out of contention for 2006
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 10:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
First things First
Chulk - Closer
Stanton - 1st Lefty
Correia - 8th inning man
Kline - 2nd Lefty
Benitez - 7th inning man
Taschner - 6th inning man, 3rd Lefty
Wright - Long man
If the Giants refuse to be sellers and continue to believe that they are in the race, at least they can try to field a more competitive bullpen.
In the long run, Benitez has to go. I think if Sabean can't get something for him in the off-season, he will DFA him. I'll give Sabean credit for being able to cut his losses.
by GiantJim on Aug 23, 2006 10:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Potential Trade
Tim Hudson: It was inconceivable that Atlanta would think about trading him a year ago, but seriously he hasn't done the job for them this year and I'm thinking they are going to need to free up some money to make a run at resigning Andruw Jones.
Scheduled to make at least $33M over the next three years (07:$6M, 08:13M, 09:13M, 10:1M buyout or $12M)he is currently 10-10 with a 4.77 ERA and a 1.44 WHIP.
If the Braves are players in the free agent market or develop their youngsters, they could decide to not resign Wickman (he'll be 38 next year, currently making $5M), clear some space with Hudson off the books and get a stop-gap closer until their youngsters are ready.
We would be getting a reliable ace to replace Schmidt, getting Alfonso off our hands, and even though I assume we'd throw in a few prospects Having a Hudson/Cain/Lowry top three would look pretty good.
Adrian Beltre: Overpaid third baseman who looks lost in Seattle, but still only 27 years old who had a monster year 2 seasons ago.
Scheduled to make $35.5M over next three seasons (07:$11.5M, 08:12M, 09:12M) he is currently hitting .267, .331OBP, 15 home runs.
The Mariners don't seem to happy with their big investment, and they could free up some cash to make a run at Schmidt. If we are hoping to resign Feliz, we are looking at a good chunk of change anyway for a guy a few years older with much less potential.
Pat Burrell: We know the Phillies will be shopping him, and Flash Gordon will be 39 next season so they might be looking for a "just-in-case" closer.
Scheduled to make $27M over next two seasons (07:$13M, 08:14M) he is currently hitting .260, .378OBP, 23 home runs.
Only 29, Burrell has fallen out of the Phillies plans. We will need to replace our outfield next year, and Burrell offers a marquee name who can hit in the middle of our line-up.
Geoff Jenkins: He is a living, breathing human being not named Armando Benitez. We have no need for this kind of player, but his salary ($7, .5M buyout for 08) matches up perfect with Armando, and once again he is not, NOT Armando Benitez.
by redhornet78 on Aug 23, 2006 11:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Potential Trade
by redhornet78 on Aug 23, 2006 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Potential Trade
by Aadik on Aug 23, 2006 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Potential Trade
I hadn't thought about Beltre, but you make a really good point that if we could get him for APPROX Feliz money, then I would rather have Beltre for the reasons you gave.
by Mayor of 311 on Aug 23, 2006 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Potential Trade
I think I'd rather have 3 years of Beltre for $35.5 than 3 years of Feliz and 1 of Mando for $28.
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Closer's mentality
Look what happened to Lidge in Houston. He was one of the best and he allowed a big bomb to Poo-Holes in the LCS last year and all of a sudden the guy went into the tank in WS and then this season he finally got demoted in favor of a committee. He clearly lost his mental edge.
Mando is so emotional that there is no way he is the type of guy who could forget the past. He dwells on it.
Worst of all, he seems like a bully. No doubt that is why Flippy keeps using him in that role. That and he is Latin. Flippy has tried to demote the guy a couple of times, but not permanently, so what was the point of that? Sometimes the demotation didn't even last until the next game. That's bad managing by Flippy, but it can't be good for the rest of the team either to know that when Mando comes in, they're going to lose or come close.
Unfortunately, in this game, closers have to be perfect or near perfect every time. Mando can't and won't be able to do that. DFA the guy. Eat the money. Addition by Subtraction. Smoke on the Water.
by nostocksjustbonds on Aug 23, 2006 11:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Closer's mentality
I certainly don't envy the role Mando put Felipe in. I think it's been a struggle to try to balance not letting him do damagae with trying their best to salvage a $21 million investment.
By sending Mando out there in different situations, Felipe did his best to let Mando find something that worked. With a couple of excpetions, it really hasn't. If it had and Mando had been able to put a better string together, the team might have been able to unload him.
by Goofus on Aug 23, 2006 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sign Up Red Hornet as Colletti Replacement
Adrian Beltre: This kid needs the NL in a bad way. His glove is above average and can hit to right center. If $$ make sense then only do this trade AFTER Schmidt signs with a club otherwise Mariners will have freed up $$ to sign Schmidt.
Pat Burrell: His stats are much better than I thought (previous seasons). Giants are short on OFs and Philly would need to eat a good chunk of salary.
Geoff Jenkins: Need OFs, LH stick is Cali boy
by wilriv21 on Aug 23, 2006 11:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Contract Year
Regarding Been-Eatin'-ez: Next year, Benitez will be in the final year of his 3 year deal. The all-important "contract year." Benitez strikes me as the type of gutless player who is motivated 100% by money, 0% by the love of the game. Once Mando realizes another big pay-out is on the line, don't be surprised if he mysteriously "turns it on."
While I consider Benitez a fat lazy slob, and one of the worst Giants in history, I do think the best is yet to come. That's not saying much, but I certainly wouldn't trade him now, at the very low point of his trade value. Wait till next year at the trading deadline. I predict Benitez will be pitching much better (not all-star level, but competent), and will merit top prospect(s) back in return.
We now resume our broadcast day.
(Fantastic site, by the way. Grant is a genius.)
by Kid Fresh on Aug 23, 2006 12:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Contract Year
by Cleophus on Aug 23, 2006 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Contract Year
Benitez + Alou to the Mets for Milledge.
by Kid Fresh on Aug 24, 2006 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Contract Year
by Grant on Aug 24, 2006 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Contract Year
I see that you read my posts there, Grant. :-)
Great to 'see' you here, KidFresh.
by Cleophus on Aug 24, 2006 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Contract Year
But you're right about Benitez... if there's a player who could be expected to turn it on in a contract year, it's Armando.
Keep the faith up there, and say hi to Great Big Sea for me...
by Pants Man on Aug 24, 2006 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
The problem that is blownitez goes back once again to the ridiculous contracts Saybean seems to be giving out in recent years. Now this albatross is about as hard to trade as Elfatso was. Red Hornet is onto something, bad contract for bad contract. We just can't stand to look at the guy anymore, and I have to assume Sabes feels the same way. They have a little more than a week to deal if they're gonna deal that fat slob.
by McPeePee on Aug 23, 2006 2:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
by howtheyscored on Aug 23, 2006 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ooh! Ooh! I have a radar for this crap...
by multiphasic on Aug 23, 2006 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Ooh! Ooh! I have a radar for this crap...
by howtheyscored on Aug 24, 2006 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grant You Fool
by mxmob33 on Aug 23, 2006 3:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Title
I'm assuming that he will do well enough for the rest of the season to show other teams that he's still valuable as a reliever. If we're lucky, someone will be desperate for a closer and take him off our hands for no cash and give us an OK prospect, someone like who the Mets traded would be OK, failing at upper levels but presumably the Giants scouts think they can do something with him.
At worse, we should be able to unload him with cash covering half his salary, I think another team would be willing to take him on as closer insurance at half price, meanwhile he would be a set up guy until the regular closer screws up badly. Which nowadays is not so rare.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Aug 23, 2006 5:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















