More Trade Rumors
This may shock you lot - but apparently, the Giants are interested in a player under the age of 35.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: More Trade Rumors
If the Rockies trade him within the division to us, they would be stupid.
Let's hope they are stupid.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 18, 2006 10:18 PM PDT reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 18, 2006 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 18, 2006 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 19, 2006 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions
What to offer
It makes sense for them to trade him. Maybe not in the division though.
I am however not willing to give up Sanchez, Accardo or Lowry. I am thinking a package including Wilson, Valdez or Hennessey.
Re: More Trade Rumors
Not so good - more Giants trade rumors. Jose frigging Vidro ?
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
Now that his power is diminished, he's 31 and injury-prone, and hasn't played a full season since 2003, the Giants are somehow interested.
Typical.
by leewhee on Jul 19, 2006 9:25 AM PDT reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
What's his contract status?
Re: More Trade Rumors
I also read today somewhere on ESPN that we are also in the market for Mike Gonzalez.... interesting, no?
by losingcalifornia on Jul 19, 2006 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 19, 2006 10:41 AM PDT reply actions
I'd give them Sanchez for Shealy
Re: I'd give them Sanchez for Shealy
Re: I'd give them Sanchez for Shealy
Re: I'd give them Sanchez for Shealy
And Shealy is no Phillips, who hit a pleasant little .259/.330/.470/.800 in his minor league career.
Shealy's senior year at Florida - .379/.454/.713/1.167
2002-2005 at four levels - .324/.417/.594/1.011
Cup of coffee in the majors - .330/.413/.473/.886 in 91 at-bats before going 2-4 today
Injury-shortened 2006 in AAA - .284/.351/.568/.919
Yes, his strikeouts or his glove could be his downfall (I bet he gets traded to the AL), and if Sabean is a little gun-shy about moving a live-armed lefty after the Liriano deal I'd understand, but I'd take that chance.
Re: More Trade Rumors
However, the concept makes a lot of sense, the Giants could take on a huge contract someone else might want to ditch. But Vidro? Don't make sense since Sabean typically try to get defense for 1B.
Which would point to a Helton trade, he has a LOT of years left on his contract with a HECK of a LOT of money, the Giants could eat that easily, replacing Bonds salary with that essentially, and he plays good defense and hits. My main issue is this appears to be a decline year and he's in the right age range for that, so he could be a gigantic version of Edgardo Alfonzo for the rest of Helton's contract.
The money deal would work with Burrell too if we play him at 1B first, then maybe move him to LF. But I would assume the poor defense would be a problem with him.
For some reason, I cannot get the Shealy article to open up, but I agree that it would take an overbid on our part to get the Rockies to part with Shealy, Sanchez, Valdez, plus maybe EME or Schierholtz or Ishikawa, because of the intra-division nature of the trade.
What other 1B that other teams want to dump?
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 19, 2006 3:33 PM PDT reply actions
Re: More Trade Rumors
Re: More Trade Rumors
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 19, 2006 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





















