Barry's legal troubles

by sularz on Jun 9, 2006 3:53 AM PDT Comment 3 comments

article in the New York Times today says Kimberly Bell has been asked by federal prosecutors not to speak with the Mitchell commission because of "the pending criminal proceeding." The significance, according to Murray Chass and Jack Curry:

"Because federal investigators asked Bell to avoid Mitchell, it is a strong indication that they are actively pursuing perjury charges and possibly additional charges of financial malfeasance against Bonds, 41, the left fielder for the San Francisco Giants."

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs | Comment 3 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Re: Barry's legal troubles

if bell is their star witness...they have no case

by bacci40 on Jun 9, 2006 10:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Re: Barry's legal troubles

She's a better witness on potential tax charges than on perjury, so maybe that's going to be their angle. Though I don't read this as saying that Bell is necessarily the "star" witness in any potential case.

by sularz on Jun 9, 2006 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Re: Barry's legal troubles

Why would they think Grimsely has any connection to Bonds? They have never played together. I've never heard of any friendship between the two players. It looks like a bit of a stretch for Barry's name to be thrown into this. And even a bigger one to think Grimsely would wear a wire to talk to Barry about steroids. Stupid stuff, but probably true. It has always been about Bonds and it still is.

yob

by Sayhey on Jun 9, 2006 10:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs