Felipe
In 20 years of being a Giants fan I have never once called for a manager or GM to be fired. I've been tempted. I've been so frustrated I wanted them gone in my heart, but I have never made public those desires. Though I've criticized moves, I've always tried to remember that they have much more baseball experience than I do, that they are closer to the team and therefore have knowledge about players I don't. That has kept me from completely writing off anybody.
That streak ends today. Felipe must go.
Not to sound too much like Larry Krueger here, but after watching the top of the 8th inning today, I can honestly say that if Felipe's brain is not composed of Cream of Wheat, then it must be made up of some other, less intelligent cereal.
For those of you lucky enough to NOT see the game today, here's the situation: 2 out, runner on 2nd, Accardo on the mound, Kendry Morales striding to the plate. Now, rather than have the Giants best reliever face a statistically anemic hitter, Felipe kept making moves (intentional walk of said anemic hitter, pitching change) until he got a matchup -- Kline vs. Napoli -- which produced a HR for the Angels less than 24 hours earlier. Kline was understandably gun-shy and walked Napoli. Izturiz followed with a 3-run double and the game was all but over.
Kline can't be considered completely blameless here, but it is a manager's job to put his players in a position to succeed, not fail. Felipe had a chance to have the inning decided in a spot where as long as Accardo kept the ball in the park, the Giants would give up no more than one run. Instead, it was decided with Kline keeping the ball in the park and still giving up three runs. Honestly, I've played Strat-O-Matic with an 11 year-old kid who has a better grasp of pitching moves than Felipe. That is not an exaggeration.
No matter what trades are made, or what holes are filled, I simply cannot have any confidence that the Giants will ever win with Felipe as manager. I know he won't be fired, so the best I can do is hope he retires at the end of the year. The problem is, I don't think he will, and I bet the Giants will re-sign him.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Felipe
by Punch Rockgroin on Jun 21, 2006 4:18 PM PDT reply actions
I forgot to mention...
This would bother me less if I thought someone might actually question Felipe on this decision, but judging from the past there will likely be no mention of this in the paper tomorrow.
by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 4:29 PM PDT reply actions
man....
Re: man....
Re: man....
by Brother Bummer on Jun 21, 2006 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: man....
In game theory, people are classified into 3 levels of cognitive reasoning:
LEVEL 1: People who make the obvious, knee-jerk move.
LEVEL 2: People who eschew the most obvious move for a surprise move (usually the opposite).
LEVEL 3: People who consider both the obvious and surprise moves before deciding which is right for any given situation.
Felipe showed today why he is mired in Level 1. He saw a lefty at the plate and he made the obvious knee-jerk move -- to bring in a lefty, even though everyone in the park knew Scioscia would likely PH a righty. All Felipe had to do was think ONE MOVE AHEAD to realize he was never going to get a lefty-lefty or righty-righty matchup. Someone with Level 3 reasoning skills would've realized that the real question was which matchup was more favorable, Accardo vs. McPherson or Kline vs. Napoli. Once you see it that way, the decision is obvious.
by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: man....
vs. LHB: .143/.250/.190
vs. RHB: .266/.275/.297
So the best chance for the Giants to escape the inning was the one that presented itself naturally, without any of Felipe's meddling.
by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: man....
vs. LHP .250/.250/.429
vs. RHP .219/.288/.329
He sucks from both sides of the plate, but he's worse as a left-handed hitter. So you have a pitcher who allows lefties to post an OPS of .440 against him vs. a hitter who hits RHP to the tune of a .616 OPS. Sounds like a great matchup for the Giants.
And I mentioned this in the gameday thread, but I feel like repeating myself:
EqA
Morales: .224
Viz II: .228
There is no reason at all to issue an IBB in a critical situation to a batter who hits worse than Viz II!
by Fog City Blues on Jun 21, 2006 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
That's why I hired Felipe
That was good enough for me.
by Brian Sabean on Jun 21, 2006 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: That's why I hired Felipe
by Felipe Alou on Jun 21, 2006 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
Re: Felipe
by Lemaster10 on Jun 21, 2006 4:41 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
by Ruths Curse Steakhouse on Jun 21, 2006 4:45 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
by Felipe Alou on Jun 22, 2006 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
So who replaces Felipe next year?
Do the Giants fill from within with Righetti or Wotus? Or do they go outside?
Personally I have always liked Righetti but I know that a lot of people on this site don't feel the same. If Wotus or Righetti don't get the job then I don't have a problem with the Giants going outside as long as whoever they hire isn't named Hargrove or Bowa.
Re: Felipe
by theclap on Jun 21, 2006 4:57 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
I'm sure I've said something similar before, especially since our current struggles have me stuck in thinking about the late '80s, but bringing back any two out of three of Robby Thompson, Will Clark, and Matt Williams to coach would be an inspiration to the team and the fans. (I've reluctantly moved on from having these guys actually come back to play and settled on the more realistic idea of having them coach.)
by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Jun 21, 2006 5:01 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
But when you look at these guys you see a pretty common theme in that they manage with passion and energy. When was the last time Felip ran out to get in the face of an umpire, get thrown out of a game, or slap some guys on the butt in the dugout to get them motivated? Probably not since the Reagan administration, if ever. I've heard it said many times before, this team plays under him, not for him.
In the 2003 playoffs he was outmanaged and outclassed by Trader Jack. We should've put him out to pasture then.
Thanks for this diary
by The Balls of Summer on Jun 21, 2006 5:09 PM PDT reply actions
I was there and
Re: Felipe
We should really focus on getting pitchers that can throw complete games, that would keep Felipe from making as many stupid decisions. Unfortunately that would require that Sabean be competent, so I guess I'll just go sit in my corner and cry about our terrible management for the next few years.
Re: Felipe
by PacBellBoozer on Jun 22, 2006 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
I also agree with you that given the status quo (another sub-par, mediocre season with lots of "meaningful games" but no real hope of accomplishing anything of significance), Felipe will most assuredly be back next year. ...Unless, there is a change even higher in the organization. Brian Sabean is the one we as fans need to focus on seeing removed.
Brian Sabean is the one who hired Felipe. And he's also the one responsible for putting this team together. You're right when you say that the Giants will never win with Felipe as manager. But I'm even more certain that you could resurrect John McGraw from the great beyond, and even he wouldn't be able to win with this current collection of flotsam and jetsam that Sabean calls a "contending baseball team".
I just think Sabean is played out, and has shown increasing signs of this since the end of 2002. I think it happens to most GMs after a time. Seems to me that GMing is pretty much a young man's game. The best ones often seem to have an initial stretch where their passion, their ideas, and their energy produce some great deals, some great decisions and some very good (even great) teams. But it does seem as if even the best MLB GMs wear down over time, and end up losing those qualities that made them effective in their heyday.
So, really, I think the time has come for Magowan to get Sabean's resignation, and bring in someone with fresh energy and some fresh ideas. Someone with an energetic, intelligent approach to the job. I think Sabean used to be that guy (or close to it), but clearly he ain't it anymore.
My point isn't that it's an either/or question between Alou and Sabean. The point is, they both need to go. And the beauty of replacing Sabean with some new blood in the GM's chair?
Felipe would be the first to go.
Re: Felipe
CBS Sports
Honestly, is this not something he could say after virtually every series-50+ times per year? Is this what he thinks of SF Giant fans? "The other guys played good." Thats it?
The observations by Josh, and others above this post are entirely with merit--backed by facts.
What do Giant fans get? The kind of arrogance and ignorance we've come to expect from elected government officials, rogue cops, white collar felons, and Dodger fans--not the manager of the not-so-long-ago "jewel franchise".
We think its tough being fans and observers? Imagine what it is like playing for such a manager. The season becomes an endurance test. Its not so much about winning anymore as your first priority. The games become a game within a game of individual cma (cover my ass) and finger pointing. Each predictable arrogant or meddling lineup change, substitution, pitching change, raises the bile level, and churns the sour stomach. You play your heart out, and he does inexplicable things that eventually foil you. You run out of faith and you run out of desire. You go into "professional mode". You do your best to concentrate on your job and your job alone from minute to minute--but after awhile, your heart just isn't in it anymore. And that takes you out of the "zone". Not real visible to most of us, unless you're looking for it. The game and the players at this level are really athletic and really fast--just ask Kevin Frandsen how fast the game is at the MLB level.
It's not apparent to most fans or media. Guys like Kruk and Kuip will occassionally slip something by accident, but are quick to follow it up with something "positive". I guess the most familiar term used is "funk". That underdefined term used to explain what appears to be the inexplicable.
Our guy, today--Lowry is not 100% physical. Just watching him on the mound one could tell he was uncomfortable--I caught glimpses of a few early innings at a restaraunt where they had the sound off. From what I saw, he pitched his heart and his ass off with his C+ game.
This is a facet of what I meant, when I alluded to "managing personalities".
This game to me illustrates the biggest difference between Baker and Alou.
First of all, no way Bake lifts Accardo. But just for arguments sake, lets say he stays with Accardo, but the results are identical.
Here's what Bake would have said.
I stayed with Accardo, because he looked strong out there. He's a great kid with closer potential and we had to give him that chance. Lowry pitched his heart out today even though he didn't have great stuff, he held them down and neutralized one of the great hitters in the game in Vlad. We made some mistakes on the field today and it cost us. But I'm proud of our pitching staff. They know our hitters are struggling right now, and they are busting butt to pick them up until they get it going again. Sabaen assures me he is going to try and get us the offensive help we need, so we're just trying to hang in there--and our pitchers did their part. Jeremy made one mistake to Izturis, and it cost us. But he's a smart kid with a lot of talent, and he'll learn from it. I don't believe he will repeat that mistake. Looking back, maybe I should have pulled him, its easy to second guess, but I'm interested in Jeremy developing as a complete pitcher too, and I wanted to give him that chance to pitch out of it. He'll get 'em next time, you'll see.
Not "The others guys played good."
Josh is right to be upset. Its not that we're losing. It's not even that Felipe is a dunderhead. Its that he treats us, and worse, our players like dunderheads.
He needs to retire going into the All-Star Break. Get our guy lined up now, Magowan; whoever it is. Somebody who can jumpstart these old broken down bastards and young pitchers into believing in themselves and each other. And bring in Craig Wilson or Sean Casey--it almost doesn't matter other than it will be a break in a new direction with new field leadership. The 10th man can only do so much.
by E Ticket on Jun 21, 2006 7:38 PM PDT reply actions
E, TrueBlue calls you a troll....
Is it possible for the Man - in - the - Blog to catch Sabean's ear? Would it matter? IS Mgmt. watching? Reading? Caring one way or the other?
by victor frankenstein on Jun 21, 2006 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions
A Fevered Mob with Torches and Pitchforks
Of all the critics to post a measured, human, almost forgiving response to this mismanaged game, your name would not have been on my candidates list.
You get my vote for Miss Amity. ;-)
And despite all, it appears to be unanimous: Felipe must go, and soon.
Re: Felipe
This guy is f'ing pathetic in his attempts at a decent record. If I've seen it once, I've seen it a million times. The Gigantes win the first two games of a three game series in exciting fashion, just for our shit for brains manager to create a lineup for the 3rd day filled with nothing but backups. He's made it clear time and time again that winning 2/3 ain't bad, but what he fails to realize is that you won't generate any momentum by telling the fans, your players, and the entire organization, that a sweep is out of the question.
Sometime last week (I believe it was during the Seattle series) I thought he said something about how if the Giants went on a 10 game win streak, the division could be ours. Being satisfied with going 2/3 is not, and should not be acceptable, and furthermore, it doesn't get us close to winning 10 in a row when he's scared to play guys every day (Unless your name is Pedro...and if that's the case, then by god you are allowed to start all 162 games of the season)
I want a skipper that chews nails, spits fire, and delivers swift kicks to the arse when necessary. I DON'T want a guy who gives into his players at every opportunity (Barry hitting 3rd, Finley not getting enough PT and refusing to play anything other than center). I'm sorry, but he's the skipper, and it's his decision to make, if the players aren't ok with it, tough luck, they aren't the one's managing the team...HE IS !
by PacBellBoozer on Jun 22, 2006 1:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
by baseballgirl @ McCovey Chronicles on Jun 21, 2006 7:38 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
Right there, in front of everybody. He forgot what he was doing when even he should have known, "Gosh, I'm on the mound doing something, but what was it? Oh yeah, when I'm on the mound I pull the pitcher." It was awful. It was telling. It was the single thing that convinced me that anything we were going to do while he's here would be despite the guy who mysteriously loses his train of thought doing the one thing he's actually had withdrawl pains from since the end of the game the night before.
Since then I've regularly seen managerial moves that make me question whether I know anything about baseball at all, even though I know for a fact that I do, but I haven't been surprised by one. Felipe's awful. He's just... so awful...
Re: Felipe
I don't remember what I just said.
by Felipe Alou on Jun 21, 2006 11:53 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
by victor frankenstein on Jun 22, 2006 12:02 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Felipe
Malt-O-Meal on a Daily Freakin' Basis
This was a GIANT SWEEP, undone by Felipe.
It's politically incorrect to talk about Krueger, so Josh understandably tiptoed. It is true that Krueger should not have laid it on so heavily against Caribbean hitters last year -- Giants of EVERY race were hacking at slop in 2005.
But Krueger was not wrong about Felipe -- and that is really why Felipe went after Krueger's job.
Felipe, your head is MUSH.
Join Krueger in Hell, you senile bastard.
KGO nothing compared to the old KNBR gig
KGO was a soft landing for him, but it's a news station and Krueger's sports voice is a minor one.
Krueger's Hell is a seven-year KNBR career of racial-evenhandedness, capped by the shame of getting fired -- ostensibly -- for a racist remark.
Re: Felipe
Winning 100 games in '03 probably put the kibosh on any dissent over his wacky in-game managing, his handling of the pitching staff, or his apparent indifference to firing up his players. The last 2 1/2 seasons, however, it's very clear the Giants clubhouse has not been a very happy place, and whatever improved 2006 ambiance we've heard about from Barry or Moises is purely due to the influx of some good clubhouse guys (Sweeney, Kline, etc.). But notice how you NEVER hear a Giants player talk about how much they enjoy playing for Felipe. There's respect/resigned acceptance for his authority, but he's pretty much the anti-Dusty. And Dusty, for all of his faults, got us within three innings of a World Series title.
I'm tired of this lifeless treading water. Sabes needs to blow this shit up, starting with the manager.
Re: Felipe
How do you come up with your topics for your FSN columns? Would it at all be possible to "vent" a bit about a certain senile skipper in ways that Kruk, Kuip, Miller, etc. can't? I guess what I'm asking is do you have any topics that you've been told are "no-no's"? I'd love to see what kind a response you'd get from an honest apprasial of our current management team (Sabes included).
Re: Felipe
the managers most important job is getting the best players on the field most of the time. Other than the asinine VizII at 1B there's not much you can do when your bullpen ERA is about 6.
I mean, it's not like he leaves guys in there too long.
Re: Felipe
No manager is perfect, and they all have different strengths. Some are good teachers, others are motivators, others are tacticians, others are talent-spotters, and so forth, and the best are strong in a number of different areas. I can't figure out what part of the job Alou is supposed to be good at. He earned his rep by developing young players in Montreal fifteen years ago, but that's pretty irrelevant on this team.
Re: Felipe
And, y'know, being a leader, knowing his players, and understanding how to get the best out of each of them.
Re: Felipe
You cannot. There is no control experiment. For all you know, his iron will and managerial panache is the sole force keeping a .400 team fighting it's way to .500.
You can't even explain dissapointing free agent results by blaming Felipe - those guys are OLD they are supposed to suddenly fall off a cliff.
What, is he holding some promising youngster back to play his veteran buddies? (my pet peeve with Baker).
Is it his fault that Bonds has been hurt? Alou? Durham? Schmidt? Benitez? Did he sign Matheny? Did he NOT sign a major league quality 1B? Did he turn Alfonzo into a useless tub o' goo?
Re: Felipe
You can't. Which is why I wonder how can you demonstrate QUANTITATIVELY that "the manager doesn't make that much difference in the outcome of a given season"?
by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 22, 2006 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
Oh come on... if this were the only criteria Felipe would have been fired over a year ago.
by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
Re: Felipe
There are regular platoons at almost five (C, 1b, CF, and then LF, RF, and 2b are each more like half platoons) of the eight fielding positions on the team. The fact is when over half of your starters are mired in some kind of platoon it's not because the best guy is starting every night and if it was to get the best guys on together as much as possible, the substitutions would be much more coordinated night to night.
To answer the question directly, Vizcaino has had regular starts this year at first and second base (not any more, thank God, but for a while there he was) and he's easily the worst option at any position. First base has been a swinging door for VizII, Sweeney, Niekro, and Ishikawa, and only Niekro's been out to injury. Three healthy players of notably different skill levels at this point in their careers and none of them is the regular starter? Sweeney is starting to get the regular starts now that Ish is down and VizII is hopefully out, but when Niekro gets back what's going to happen? I think we know. I haven't been thrilled with the picks for catcher recently either. Greene is the better hitter and his defense isn't much of a liability and God forbid he can get the ball to second on no hops.
I could go on into more middling, less significant benchings, but I'll stop there.
The point is when you put your best players on the field together as much as you can you get roster consistency, and for the last two or three years the Giants have had none.
by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
C platoon: Oh be serious - who's better Alfonzo, or Greene? Don't tell me you believe Todd Greene is a .300 hitter either.
OF - OK, I actually think the 4-player rotation plan is a good one given then aged nature. I think Finley's slump is due to overuse caused by injuries to Bonds/Alou, when they are both out, what can you do?
2B - Durham is broken and can't play everyday. He's not being "platooned".
1B - Is supposed to be a platoon. What's Sweeney hitting? .305/.450? but .339/.530 against RHP (I think he's 1 for 22 against LHP). I would agree with letting Ishikawa play, but you can't pin sending him down on Felipe, can you?
Lineup order doesn't matter anyway - this has bee prooven over and over again.
Overall - this is an old, old team. I don't think the guys over 38 should be playing every day.
Re: Felipe
I only have problems with two things here, so here they are.
I don't believe that Todd Greene is a .300 hitter, but as long as the guy is hitting damn .300 ball put him in. Greene has been in the majors a long time, in 11 years Alfonso only cracked the bigs by circumstance. He calls a good game, but his hitting is no better than Greene's and his defense is awful, but he's getting starts 2/3 days? What? Not that it matters anyway.
And also lineup order does matter. We should know that as much as anybody, we who have to deal with Barry Fucking Bonds constantly leading off innings because the guy batting third is garbage. Some guys statistically actually do bat better up or down in the order. Pedro Feliz, for instance, bats trash when he's up in the order but has been actually pretty decent when he's batting 5-7. Who would dream of having Mike Matheny lead off? You want your on base guys up before your RBI guys, and most players are good at really one or the other. Specific batting order can be played with, moving a guy up or down one or two spots, but I've seen so much pinballing of just about everybody not named Bonds or Alou on this team (or Vizquel this year, maybe Winn) that it sometimes seems like arbitrary decision making and especially in the national league there is strategy to batting order.
Yes, the platoons and the rest days are necessary for this team, but there is so little coordination of who plays when, even despite injuries, that we only have our best team together on the field once about ever four days. I'm not saying it's not necessary. I'm saying that what is necessary is being done poorly. I mucked that up before by trying to prove too much of a point.
by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
*Crappy farm system (especially for position players)
*Cheap ownership
*GM in a slump, if not gone to seed
Re: Felipe
Cheap ownership is a bit of a mixup. The payroll isn't quite as big as it could be, I know this, you know this, Magowan knows this, but it's also not by any means small.
Whenever I think, damn that payroll I get to thinking, "but I *really* like this new park we play in, that Magowan basically built himself..." and then sometimes I think, but it's been a few years with ridiculous dividends paying off from having the park, but then I think "Well what the hell do I know about economic and park revenue to team finances..."
And I know Magowan is dedicated to the success of this ballclub and I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be any cheaper than any of us could justify in order to try to get that success, so I'm inclined to believe that while not as much as could go into the payroll does go there, we don't have more visible spending money because the actual spending money isn't as much as I'd like to think.
Mostly I'm uninformed, but I also like to believe in this ownership, because it's been good to us.
by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Felipe
I think that pulling a pitcher
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Jun 23, 2006 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Anyway, the stat goes something like in baseball when a team gets into a save situation they actually on average lose the game something like 40% of the time. Throw in a money closer who converts say even as low as 80% and your team's got a serious leg up on that.
I admit it sounds kind of like a bogus stat, but the difference in games won it allows is probably between 10-20 just about, and that doesn't seem too extreme.
by howtheyscored on Jun 23, 2006 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
You can't even really look at league-wide save statistics, unless you break them down into 1-run, 2-run, 3-run saves. If a league average pitcher gives up 0.5 runs/inning (4.50 ERA)
Then his team should win
~75% ahead 1 run in the 9th (some times you will get a blown save and someone will vulture the win)
For a 3-run save it's probably like 90%.
winning 60% of you save situations doesn't seem right, unless you include games that are tied starting the 9th.
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Re: Felipe
by Giant Dwarf on Jun 23, 2006 12:02 PM PDT reply actions

by 


















