Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Felipe

In 20 years of being a Giants fan I have never once called for a manager or GM to be fired. I've been tempted. I've been so frustrated I wanted them gone in my heart, but I have never made public those desires. Though I've criticized moves, I've always tried to remember that they have much more baseball experience than I do, that they are closer to the team and therefore have knowledge about players I don't. That has kept me from completely writing off anybody.

That streak ends today. Felipe must go.

Not to sound too much like Larry Krueger here, but after watching the top of the 8th inning today, I can honestly say that if Felipe's brain is not composed of Cream of Wheat, then it must be made up of some other, less intelligent cereal.

For those of you lucky enough to NOT see the game today, here's the situation: 2 out, runner on 2nd, Accardo on the mound, Kendry Morales striding to the plate. Now, rather than have the Giants best reliever face a statistically anemic hitter, Felipe kept making moves (intentional walk of said anemic hitter, pitching change) until he got a matchup -- Kline vs. Napoli -- which produced a HR for the Angels less than 24 hours earlier. Kline was understandably gun-shy and walked Napoli. Izturiz followed with a 3-run double and the game was all but over.

Kline can't be considered completely blameless here, but it is a manager's job to put his players in a position to succeed, not fail. Felipe had a chance to have the inning decided in a spot where as long as Accardo kept the ball in the park, the Giants would give up no more than one run. Instead, it was decided with Kline keeping the ball in the park and still giving up three runs. Honestly, I've played Strat-O-Matic with an 11 year-old kid who has a better grasp of pitching moves than Felipe. That is not an exaggeration.

No matter what trades are made, or what holes are filled, I simply cannot have any confidence that the Giants will ever win with Felipe as manager. I know he won't be fired, so the best I can do is hope he retires at the end of the year. The problem is, I don't think he will, and I bet the Giants will re-sign him.

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Felipe
We're at our absolute best when Felipe doesn't manage at all. That says alot. He really should've just let Accardo pitch out of the inning. But he reverted back to his '04 form with his pitching changes. He has a total lack of confidence in our good pitchers and has too much in the gas cans.
We're going to win the World Series. Eventually. Someday. I hope.

by Punch Rockgroin on Jun 21, 2006 4:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I forgot to mention...
Even after the stupid IBB to Morales, he could've left in Accardo to face McPherson (.762 OPS), but chose instead chose Kline to face Napoli (.921 OPS). Even disregarding the fact that Napoli hit the HR off Kline the previous day, why choose to have a less effective pitcher to face a more effective hitter? It makes absolutely no sense at all.

This would bother me less if I thought someone might actually question Felipe on this decision, but judging from the past there will likely be no mention of this in the paper tomorrow.

"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f***ing amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 4:29 PM PDT reply actions  

man....
his decisions must have been awful.  As you mentioned, I have never heard you call for the head of anyone associated with the Giants.
You look like I need a drink

by kenshin1 on Jun 21, 2006 4:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: man....
Calling for head rarely yields positive results.  You have to ask nicely.
Ironically clever comment.

by Goofus on Jun 21, 2006 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: man....
Genius.
Go home, Benitez. Go home.

by Brother Bummer on Jun 21, 2006 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: man....
I actually take pride in that. I don't like to overreact, so every time I see a move I don't like, I try to see it from the decision maker's point of view. Like today, when Felipe had Morales walked intentionally, I disagreed with it, but understood his motive: walk a lefty to get a righty-righty matchup. But there was no good reason for lifting Accardo for Kline, and it made me question whether or not Felipe is actually stupid.

In game theory, people are classified into 3 levels of cognitive reasoning:

LEVEL 1: People who make the obvious, knee-jerk move.
LEVEL 2: People who eschew the most obvious move for a surprise move (usually the opposite).
LEVEL 3: People who consider both the obvious and surprise moves before deciding which is right for any given situation.

Felipe showed today why he is mired in Level 1. He saw a lefty at the plate and he made the obvious knee-jerk move -- to bring in a lefty, even though everyone in the park knew Scioscia would likely PH a righty. All Felipe had to do was think ONE MOVE AHEAD to realize he was never going to get a lefty-lefty or righty-righty matchup. Someone with Level 3 reasoning skills would've realized that the real question was which matchup was more favorable, Accardo vs. McPherson or Kline vs. Napoli. Once you see it that way, the decision is obvious.

"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f***ing amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: man....
One look at Accardo's splits makes Felipe's moves appear even more stupid:

vs. LHB: .143/.250/.190    
vs. RHB: .266/.275/.297

So the best chance for the Giants to escape the inning was the one that presented itself naturally, without any of Felipe's meddling.

"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f***ing amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 21, 2006 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: man....
And check out Morales' splits (small sample disclaimer):

vs. LHP .250/.250/.429
vs. RHP .219/.288/.329

He sucks from both sides of the plate, but he's worse as a left-handed hitter.  So you have a pitcher who allows lefties to post an OPS of .440 against him vs. a hitter who hits RHP to the tune of a .616 OPS.  Sounds like a great matchup for the Giants.

And I mentioned this in the gameday thread, but I feel like repeating myself:

EqA

Morales: .224
Viz II: .228

There is no reason at all to issue an IBB in a critical situation to a batter who hits worse than Viz II!

by Fog City Blues on Jun 21, 2006 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's why I hired Felipe
When I interviewed him, I asked, "How much do you rely on stats?" He replied, "What is a 'stat'?"

That was good enough for me.

Felipe Alou on Pedro Feliz: "He's a baseball player."

by Brian Sabean on Jun 21, 2006 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: That's why I hired Felipe
Who?
Anybody wanna go to the Sizzler?

by Felipe Alou on Jun 21, 2006 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I still think the only reason we got Felipe was so we could get Moises for cheap. Well a lot of good that did us. I agree we will never have a shot in hell of winning with Felipe calling the shots. His handling of the bullpen alone makes Dusty look like a tactical genius. It's time for a total house cleaning, starting from the top.
I use my hand, to wipe my tears.

by McPeePee on Jun 21, 2006 4:31 PM PDT reply actions  

You sir..
Are a messenger of satan.

by mxmob33 on Jun 21, 2006 4:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I'm with you, that eighth inning was ridiculous.  The thing is that when the bullpen was imploding with Mando out last and this year we were told that the biggest problem was that the loss of a closer takes every reliever out of their natural role and that they would start performing better when they were put back in the right role.  But now that we have our closer I have no idea what roles each of our relievers is has based on Felipe's usage.  I thought Kline was supposed to be our lefty specialist, but every time I look he seems to be facing righties.  Accardo looks a lot like our eigtht inning guy but today he wasn't allowed to finish the eighth and yesterday he had Worrell(!) come in in the eighth after Kline had given up an HR to a righty.  I like old people as much as the next guy but I don't necessarily want them driving in front of me on the freeway, serving as President of the US, or managing my baseball team.  I get the feeling, however, that the powers-that-be in the Giants front office are perfectly content to let Felipe live out his waning days managing the Giants.  
Lemaster10

by Lemaster10 on Jun 21, 2006 4:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I think Felipe was just inspired by the way Tony LaRussa handled last night's game against the White Sox and decided that he should aspire to such greatness.

by Ruths Curse Steakhouse on Jun 21, 2006 4:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Word, baby. Word. I love that man.
Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48 and am what some people call "mentally retarded."

by Felipe Alou on Jun 22, 2006 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
He's simply overthinking situations. You are absolutely right about how he should have just left Accardo in. I don't think the Giants are going to re-hire him, so I guess we are just going to have to wait out this year and hope for a bit of luck.

So who replaces Felipe next year?
Do the Giants fill from within with Righetti or Wotus? Or do they go outside?

Personally I have always liked Righetti but I know that a lot of people on this site don't feel the same. If Wotus or Righetti don't get the job then I don't have a problem with the Giants going outside as long as whoever they hire isn't named Hargrove or Bowa.

by Keenlow on Jun 21, 2006 4:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
How much of the bullpen (mis)management might be Righetti's or Gardner's fault?

by Cleophus on Jun 21, 2006 4:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Felipe couldn't manage a hot dog stand at this point. Time to put him out to pasture and let the cows have at him. how about bringing matty williams back to run the team? too bad hes announcer and part-owner of the tea-bags
Felipe: "I'm thinking if having Bonds hit leadoff. Or eight. No, wait, pitching. Anyway, I haven't talked to him about it yet

by theclap on Jun 21, 2006 4:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Robby Thompson expressed an interest in returning to the Giants organization on KNBR yesterday morning, and this morning Krukow was saying he had little doubt Robby would be a manager some day. The only thing holding this up is that he has twins that I believe are around 16, so it wouldn't happen for at least another year or two as he wants to be home while his kids are in the house.

I'm sure I've said something similar before, especially since our current struggles have me stuck in thinking about the late '80s, but bringing back any two out of three of Robby Thompson, Will Clark, and Matt Williams to coach would be an inspiration to the team and the fans. (I've reluctantly moved on from having these guys actually come back to play and settled on the more realistic idea of having them coach.)

by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Jun 21, 2006 5:01 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I've heard talk of Bob Brenly and Lou Pinella...don't know how realistic that is.

But when you look at these guys you see a pretty common theme in that they manage with passion and energy. When was the last time Felip ran out to get in the face of an umpire, get thrown out of a game, or slap some guys on the butt in the dugout to get them motivated? Probably not since the Reagan administration, if ever. I've heard it said many times before, this team plays under him, not for him.

In the 2003 playoffs he was outmanaged and outclassed by Trader Jack. We should've put him out to pasture then.

I use my hand, to wipe my tears.

by McPeePee on Jun 21, 2006 5:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks for this diary
Looking at the box score, I was disappointed that Accardo had a bad outing.  Now I know......the rest of the story.
Vizcaino? 1st base? WTF?

by The Balls of Summer on Jun 21, 2006 5:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I was there and
they had Hennessey warming up since Noah started getting a bit weird in like the fifth. So why not put Henny in right away? Who knows, who knows.

by tk on Jun 21, 2006 6:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I'm so sick of Felipe.  I know there's no chance he'll be fired, but he deserves to be.  His management has been consistently terrible.

We should really focus on getting pitchers that can throw complete games, that would keep Felipe from making as many stupid decisions.  Unfortunately that would require that Sabean be competent, so I guess I'll just go sit in my corner and cry about our terrible management for the next few years.

by Snof on Jun 21, 2006 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Pitchers throwing complete games is one thing, but he'd still manage to throw batting orders out there like he created them with a Lineup Generating Randomizer.  Todays starting lineup was just pathetic.  Aside from Winn and Omar, you could IBB just about anyone in the order and not be all that worried about the next guy in the lineup.  There's no way this guy could be considered a "players" manager, because I can think of a few guys on the roster (Ellison, Hennessey, Greene, etc.) who continually get shafted because of his mismanagement.  The one time he actually gives them a start, maybe once a week at best, their in a horrible funk because they don't know from day to day when they're going to be in the lineup or not.  As a player he must of never prepared himself for playing on the way to the ballpark or while taking BP, because he seems to forget that without some form of structure and reasoning his moves just stink of being random, thick-headed, and irrational at best.
DFA Alou the Elder !

by PacBellBoozer on Jun 22, 2006 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Josh, I'm in 100% agreement with you.  Day after day with Felipe, it's just a never-ending stream of idiotic, incomprehensible moves.  I used to think Dusty was bad in this regard--particularly with pitching moves.  But Felipe makes Dusty look like Earl Freakin' Weaver.  And Dusty's failure as an in-game strategist was generally mitigated by his unsurpassed ability to communicate with his players and keep them engaged and motivated.  The hallmark of Felipe's three+ years has been disgruntled pitchers, schisms within the team, bad chemistry, and communiques from Felipe to given players through the press.

I also agree with you that given the status quo (another sub-par, mediocre season with lots of "meaningful games" but no real hope of accomplishing anything of significance), Felipe will most assuredly be back next year.  ...Unless, there is a change even higher in the organization.  Brian Sabean is the one we as fans need to focus on seeing removed.  

Brian Sabean is the one who hired Felipe.  And he's also the one responsible for putting this team together.  You're right when you say that the Giants will never win with Felipe as manager.  But I'm even more certain that you could resurrect John McGraw from the great beyond, and even he wouldn't be able to win with this current collection of flotsam and jetsam that Sabean calls a "contending baseball team".

I just think Sabean is played out, and has shown increasing signs of this since the end of 2002.  I think it happens to most GMs after a time.  Seems to me that GMing is pretty much a young man's game.  The best ones often seem to have an initial stretch where their passion, their ideas, and their energy produce some great deals, some great decisions and some very good (even great) teams.  But it does seem as if even the best MLB GMs wear down over time, and end up losing those qualities that made them effective in their heyday.

So, really, I think the time has come for Magowan to get Sabean's resignation, and bring in someone with fresh energy and some fresh ideas. Someone with an energetic, intelligent approach to the job. I think Sabean used to be that guy (or close to it), but clearly he ain't it anymore.

My point isn't that it's an either/or question between Alou and Sabean.  The point is, they both need to go.  And the beauty of replacing Sabean with some new blood in the GM's chair?  

Felipe would be the first to go.

Just trying to get by Being quiet and shy In a world full of pushing and shove

by tobias on Jun 21, 2006 7:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
With his usual forthrightness, insight, and communication skills, Felipe addresses the many questions and criticisms directed at him following today's totally demoralizing, predictable loss to yet another slumping, underperforming team from the AL West.
"This is a tough team to sweep," Giants manager Felipe Alou said. "They played some baseball today. They hit, they pitched, they picked up the ball and they stole some bases."

      CBS Sports

Honestly, is this not something he could say after virtually every series-50+ times per year?  Is this what he thinks of SF Giant fans?  "The other guys played good."  Thats it?

The observations by Josh, and others above this post are entirely with merit--backed by facts.

What do Giant fans get? The kind of arrogance and ignorance we've come to expect from elected government officials, rogue cops, white collar felons, and Dodger fans--not the manager of the not-so-long-ago "jewel franchise".

We think its tough being fans and observers? Imagine what it is like playing for such a  manager. The season becomes an endurance test. Its not so much about winning anymore as your first priority.  The games become a game within a game of individual cma (cover my ass) and finger pointing.  Each predictable arrogant or meddling lineup change, substitution, pitching change, raises the bile level, and churns the sour stomach.  You play your heart out, and he does inexplicable things that eventually foil you.  You run out of faith and you run out of desire.  You go into "professional mode".  You do your best to concentrate on your job and your job alone from minute to minute--but after awhile, your heart just isn't in it anymore. And that takes you out of the "zone".  Not real visible to most of us, unless you're looking for it.  The game and the players at this level are really athletic and really fast--just ask Kevin Frandsen how fast the game is at the MLB level.

It's not apparent to most fans or media. Guys like Kruk and Kuip will occassionally slip something by accident, but are quick to follow it up with something "positive".  I guess the most familiar term used is "funk".  That underdefined term used to explain what appears to be the inexplicable.  

Our guy, today--Lowry is not 100% physical.  Just watching him on the mound one could tell he was uncomfortable--I caught glimpses of a few early innings at a restaraunt where they had the sound off.  From what I saw, he pitched his heart and his ass off with his C+ game.  

This is a facet of what I meant, when I alluded to "managing personalities".

This game to me illustrates the biggest difference between Baker and Alou.

First of all, no way Bake lifts Accardo.  But just for arguments sake, lets say he stays with Accardo, but the results are identical.

Here's what Bake would have said.

I stayed with Accardo, because he looked strong out there.  He's a great kid with closer potential and we had to give him that chance.  Lowry pitched his heart out today even though he didn't have great stuff, he held them down and neutralized one of the great hitters in the game in Vlad.  We made some mistakes on the field today and it cost us.  But I'm proud of our pitching staff.  They know our hitters are struggling right now, and they are busting butt to pick them up until they get it going again.  Sabaen assures me he is going to try and get us the offensive help we need, so we're just trying to hang in there--and our pitchers did their part.  Jeremy made one mistake to Izturis, and it cost us.  But he's a smart kid with a lot of talent, and he'll learn from it. I don't believe he will repeat that mistake. Looking back, maybe I should have pulled him, its easy to second guess, but I'm interested in Jeremy developing as a complete pitcher too, and I wanted to give him that chance to pitch out of it.  He'll get 'em next time, you'll see.

Not "The others guys played good."

Josh is right to be upset.  Its not that we're losing. It's not even that Felipe is a dunderhead. Its that he treats us, and worse, our players like dunderheads.

He needs to retire going into the All-Star Break.  Get our guy lined up now, Magowan; whoever it is. Somebody who can jumpstart these old broken down bastards and young pitchers into believing in themselves and each other.  And bring in Craig Wilson or Sean Casey--it almost doesn't matter other than it will be a break in a new direction with new field leadership.   The 10th man can only do so much.

He blames Tomko and I blame Magowan, Alou, Morris, Benitez, El Dopo and a player to be named sooner rather than later--Lance Tool Niekro

by E Ticket on Jun 21, 2006 7:38 PM PDT reply actions  

E, TrueBlue calls you a troll....
I call you a beautiful schizophrenic.
Is it possible for the Man - in - the - Blog to catch Sabean's ear? Would it matter? IS Mgmt. watching? Reading? Caring one way or the other?
Ladies and Gentlemen...The Ken Kendrick Karma Kameleon Karnival Klown Krusade welcomes you to Urine Sample Cup Night!

by victor frankenstein on Jun 21, 2006 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

A Fevered Mob with Torches and Pitchforks
E, I cannot believe you are taking this with such equanimity. Watching this winnable game rankled me in much the same way it did Josh and others on this thread, and the results are these geysers of bile.

Of all the critics to post a measured, human, almost forgiving response to this mismanaged game, your name would not have been on my candidates list.

You get my vote for Miss Amity.  ;-)

And despite all, it appears to be unanimous: Felipe must go, and soon.

by Moggeee on Jun 22, 2006 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Well put E.  Again you and I are in 100% agreement.  I actually had this exact conversation with a fellow fan this afternoon after seeing the lineup he posted, then watching how he handled the Accardo situation.

This guy is f'ing pathetic in his attempts at a decent record.  If I've seen it once, I've seen it a million times.  The Gigantes win the first two games of a three game series in exciting fashion, just for our shit for brains manager to create a lineup for the 3rd day filled with nothing but backups.  He's made it clear time and time again that winning 2/3 ain't bad, but what he fails to realize is that you won't generate any momentum by telling the fans, your players, and the entire organization, that a sweep is out of the question.  

Sometime last week (I believe it was during the Seattle series) I thought he said something about how if the Giants went on a 10 game win streak, the division could be ours.  Being satisfied with going 2/3 is not, and should not be acceptable, and furthermore, it doesn't get us close to winning 10 in a row when he's scared to play guys every day (Unless your name is Pedro...and if that's the case, then by god you are allowed to start all 162 games of the season)  

I want a skipper that chews nails, spits fire, and delivers swift kicks to the arse when necessary.  I DON'T want a guy who gives into his players at every opportunity (Barry hitting 3rd, Finley not getting enough PT and refusing to play anything other than center).  I'm sorry, but he's the skipper, and it's his decision to make, if the players aren't ok with it, tough luck, they aren't the one's managing the team...HE IS !

DFA Alou the Elder !

by PacBellBoozer on Jun 22, 2006 1:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I couldn't agree with you more Josh, I CAN NOT take Felipe anymore!!! Time and time again he makes poor decisions, even my 7yr old nephew thinks he has Cream of Wheat for brains...

by baseballgirl @ McCovey Chronicles on Jun 21, 2006 7:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I knew Felipe was fried last year when I saw with my own eyes the old man trot (well, hobble) to the mound, say something to the picther, trot (well, you know) about halfway back to the dugout before realizing that, damn, he forgot to take the damn pitcher out! Sure enough he didn't play it off like he just went to talk out there. He turned around, made the half trek again, and yanked him.

Right there, in front of everybody. He forgot what he was doing when even he should have known, "Gosh, I'm on the mound doing something, but what was it? Oh yeah, when I'm on the mound I pull the pitcher." It was awful. It was telling. It was the single thing that convinced me that anything we were going to do while he's here would be despite the guy who mysteriously loses his train of thought doing the one thing he's actually had withdrawl pains from since the end of the game the night before.

Since then I've regularly seen managerial moves that make me question whether I know anything about baseball at all, even though I know for a fact that I do, but I haven't been surprised by one. Felipe's awful. He's just... so awful...

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 21, 2006 10:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Man, this is some bullshit. I am one of the best managers ever to put on a uniform. Well, next to Tony LaRussa. He's the best. I learned the double switch from him. I don't really know what it...

I don't remember what I just said.

Anybody wanna go to the Sizzler?

by Felipe Alou on Jun 21, 2006 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
You caused me to laugh.The laughing caused tears.Please...a hand.To wipe them away.
Ladies and Gentlemen...The Ken Kendrick Karma Kameleon Karnival Klown Krusade welcomes you to Urine Sample Cup Night!

by victor frankenstein on Jun 22, 2006 12:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I use my hand, to wipe my tears.

by McPeePee on Jun 22, 2006 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Malt-O-Meal on a Daily Freakin' Basis
Nine out of ten bloggers ON THIS SITE could have managed the Giants to a victory today.

This was a GIANT SWEEP, undone by Felipe.

It's politically incorrect to talk about Krueger, so Josh understandably tiptoed. It is true that Krueger should not have laid it on so heavily against Caribbean hitters last year -- Giants of EVERY race were hacking at slop in 2005.

But Krueger was not wrong about Felipe -- and that is really why Felipe went after Krueger's job.

Felipe, your head is MUSH.

Join Krueger in Hell, you senile bastard.

by Moggeee on Jun 22, 2006 12:15 AM PDT reply actions  

KGO nothing compared to the old KNBR gig
Krueger was BORN to do Giant postgame talk.

KGO was a soft landing for him, but it's a news station and Krueger's sports voice is a minor one.

Krueger's Hell is a seven-year KNBR career of racial-evenhandedness, capped by the shame of getting fired -- ostensibly -- for a racist remark.

by Moggeee on Jun 22, 2006 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
There's not much to add that hasn't already been well articulated in the above posts, except to expand on something E wrote, about what it must be like to play for Felipe now.

Winning 100 games in '03 probably put the kibosh on any dissent over his wacky in-game managing, his handling of the pitching staff, or his apparent indifference to firing up his players. The last 2 1/2 seasons, however, it's very clear the Giants clubhouse has not been a very happy place, and whatever improved 2006 ambiance we've heard about from Barry or Moises is purely due to the influx of some good clubhouse guys (Sweeney, Kline, etc.). But notice how you NEVER hear a Giants player talk about how much they enjoy playing for Felipe. There's respect/resigned acceptance for his authority, but he's pretty much the anti-Dusty. And Dusty, for all of his faults, got us within three innings of a World Series title.

I'm tired of this lifeless treading water. Sabes needs to blow this shit up, starting with the manager.

by Kitspool on Jun 22, 2006 12:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
One question for you Grant...

How do you come up with your topics for your FSN columns?  Would it at all be possible to "vent" a bit about a certain senile skipper in ways that Kruk, Kuip, Miller, etc. can't?  I guess what I'm asking is do you have any topics that you've been told are "no-no's"?  I'd love to see what kind a response you'd get from an honest apprasial of our current management team (Sabes included).

DFA Alou the Elder !

by PacBellBoozer on Jun 22, 2006 2:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I have no love for Yoda either, but realistically, the manager doesn't make that much difference in the outcome of a given season.

the managers most important job is getting the best players on the field most of the time.  Other than the asinine VizII at 1B there's not much you can do when your bullpen ERA is about 6.

I mean, it's not like he leaves guys in there too long.

by zenbitz on Jun 22, 2006 9:25 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
How can you possibly know how much difference the manager makes? We probably obsess too much about the individual game decisions the manager makes, but it's a huge job, and many of the consequences of what the manager says and does are hard to assess clearly. And the bullpen ERA is terrible in large part because Felipe does such a spectacularly awful job of managing it.

No manager is perfect, and they all have different strengths. Some are good teachers, others are motivators, others are tacticians, others are talent-spotters, and so forth, and the best are strong in a number of different areas. I can't figure out what part of the job Alou is supposed to be good at. He earned his rep by developing young players in Montreal fifteen years ago, but that's pretty irrelevant on this team.

by Evan on Jun 22, 2006 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
"the managers most important job is getting the best players on the field most of the time."

And, y'know, being a leader, knowing his players, and understanding how to get the best out of each of them.

by Skaldheim on Jun 22, 2006 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
How can you demonstrate QUANTITATIVELY whether or not a manager is getting the most out of his players?

You cannot.  There is no control experiment.  For all you know,  his iron will and managerial panache is the sole force keeping a .400 team fighting it's way to .500.

You can't even explain dissapointing free agent results by blaming Felipe - those guys are OLD they are supposed to suddenly fall off a cliff.

What, is he holding some promising youngster back to play his veteran buddies? (my pet peeve with Baker).

Is it his fault that Bonds has been hurt?  Alou?  Durham?  Schmidt?  Benitez?   Did he sign Matheny?  Did he NOT sign a major league quality 1B?  Did he turn Alfonzo into a useless tub o' goo?

by zenbitz on Jun 22, 2006 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
>"How can you demonstrate QUANTITATIVELY whether or not a manager is getting the most out of his players?"

You can't. Which is why I wonder how can you demonstrate QUANTITATIVELY that "the manager doesn't make that much difference in the outcome of a given season"?

"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f***ing amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Jun 22, 2006 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
"the managers most important job is getting the best players on the field most of the time."

Oh come on... if this were the only criteria Felipe would have been fired over a year ago.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Whom has he regularly benched to play a worse player?  He has to play with the roster he's dealt.

by zenbitz on Jun 22, 2006 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
The lineup and the order is almost uniquely different EVERY single night, and that's even taking into account that injuries have alternately afflicted Alou, Bonds, Durham, Niekro, and Matheny not all at the same time. If he was consistently playing the best players together (i.e. picking rest days so his older "best" guys play at the same time and don't play at the same time), then there wouldn't be so much noticeable shifting night to night.

There are regular platoons at almost five (C, 1b, CF, and then LF, RF, and 2b are each more like half platoons) of the eight fielding positions on the team. The fact is when over half of your starters are mired in some kind of platoon it's not because the best guy is starting every night and if it was to get the best guys on together as much as possible, the substitutions would be much more coordinated night to night.

To answer the question directly, Vizcaino has had regular starts this year at first and second base (not any more, thank God, but for a while there he was) and he's easily the worst option at any position. First base has been a swinging door for VizII, Sweeney, Niekro, and Ishikawa, and only Niekro's been out to injury. Three healthy players of notably different skill levels at this point in their careers and none of them is the regular starter? Sweeney is starting to get the regular starts now that Ish is down and VizII is hopefully out, but when Niekro gets back what's going to happen? I think we know. I haven't been thrilled with the picks for catcher recently either. Greene is the better hitter and his defense isn't much of a liability and God forbid he can get the ball to second on no hops.

I could go on into more middling, less significant benchings, but I'll stop there.

The point is when you put your best players on the field together as much as you can you get roster consistency, and for the last two or three years the Giants have had none.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
One by one - it's criminal for VizII to start at first.  Almost as criminal as having him on the roster in the first place.

C platoon:  Oh be serious - who's better Alfonzo, or Greene?  Don't tell me you believe Todd Greene is a .300 hitter either.

OF - OK, I actually think the 4-player rotation plan is a good one given then aged nature.  I think Finley's slump is due to overuse caused by injuries to Bonds/Alou, when they are both out, what can you do?  

2B - Durham is broken and can't play everyday.  He's not being "platooned".

1B - Is supposed to be a platoon.  What's Sweeney hitting?  .305/.450?  but .339/.530 against RHP (I think he's 1 for 22 against LHP).  I would agree with letting Ishikawa play, but you can't pin sending him down on Felipe, can you?

Lineup order doesn't matter anyway - this has bee prooven over and over again.

Overall - this is an old, old team.  I don't think the guys over 38 should be playing every day.

by zenbitz on Jun 22, 2006 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
They are old, and they shouldn't be playing every day, but when they are relatively healthy they should be in the lineup together as much as possible.

I only have problems with two things here, so here they are.

I don't believe that Todd Greene is a .300 hitter, but as long as the guy is hitting damn .300 ball put him in. Greene has been in the majors a long time, in 11 years Alfonso only cracked the bigs by circumstance. He calls a good game, but his hitting is no better than Greene's and his defense is awful, but he's getting starts 2/3 days? What? Not that it matters anyway.

And also lineup order does matter. We should know that as much as anybody, we who have to deal with Barry Fucking Bonds constantly leading off innings because the guy batting third is garbage. Some guys statistically actually do bat better up or down in the order. Pedro Feliz, for instance, bats trash when he's up in the order but has been actually pretty decent when he's batting 5-7. Who would dream of having Mike Matheny lead off? You want your on base guys up before your RBI guys, and most players are good at really one or the other. Specific batting order can be played with, moving a guy up or down one or two spots, but I've seen so much pinballing of just about everybody not named Bonds or Alou on this team (or Vizquel this year, maybe Winn) that it sometimes seems like arbitrary decision making and especially in the national league there is strategy to batting order.

Yes, the platoons and the rest days are necessary for this team, but there is so little coordination of who plays when, even despite injuries, that we only have our best team together on the field once about ever four days. I'm not saying it's not necessary. I'm saying that what is necessary is being done poorly. I mucked that up before by trying to prove too much of a point.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
I am not coming to Felipe's defense, but all these posts make me think of other problems with this team that, if not present, could mask any incompetence on Felipe's part:
   *Crappy farm system (especially for position players)
   *Cheap ownership
   *GM in a slump, if not gone to seed

by Cleophus on Jun 22, 2006 3:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Crappy farm system and GM in a slump I'm with ya' for.

Cheap ownership is a bit of a mixup. The payroll isn't quite as big as it could be, I know this, you know this, Magowan knows this, but it's also not by any means small.

Whenever I think, damn that payroll I get to thinking, "but I *really* like this new park we play in, that Magowan basically built himself..." and then sometimes I think, but it's been a few years with ridiculous dividends paying off from having the park, but then I think "Well what the hell do I know about economic and park revenue to team finances..."

And I know Magowan is dedicated to the success of this ballclub and I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be any cheaper than any of us could justify in order to try to get that success, so I'm inclined to believe that while not as much as could go into the payroll does go there, we don't have more visible spending money because the actual spending money isn't as much as I'd like to think.

Mostly I'm uninformed, but I also like to believe in this ownership, because it's been good to us.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
Magowan's a fan, and I trust that he does want to win it all.  But he's the mouthpiece for the big investors like Don Fisher, and I'm not sure those guys are not just content to remain "competitive" and keep butts in the seats at PacBell/SBC/AT&T Park.

by Cleophus on Jun 22, 2006 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that pulling a pitcher
that is throwing strikes and getting outs just because he is left handed or right handed is the stupidist strategic move in all of sports. You are replacing a relative "known" for a complete "unknown" on that given day. Just my humble opinion.

by Running on Jun 22, 2006 9:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Have you seen Homer at the Bat?
Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 22, 2006 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
I completely agree. This drives me nuts. There have just been so many times when a guy comes in and gets a few outs, but then the manager pulls him and the guy who is brought in can't find the strike zone. In fact, I'd be happier having two or three guys that can pitch two or three innings per game pitch the 7th-9th than to have a closer. I just don't see any reason why teams need to pay so much to have one person pitch only one inning, and only in certain situations.

by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on Jun 23, 2006 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
There's a statistic I heard, and I don't know anything about the facts to substantiate it, but it came from the mouth of a professor so that must be something...

Anyway, the stat goes something like in baseball when a team gets into a save situation they actually on average lose the game something like 40% of the time. Throw in a money closer who converts say even as low as 80% and your team's got a serious leg up on that.

I admit it sounds kind of like a bogus stat, but the difference in games won it allows is probably between 10-20 just about, and that doesn't seem too extreme.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jun 23, 2006 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
10 games in the win column is what Bonds is worth in  a typical year.  No closer has ever been worth that much, ever.

You can't even really look at league-wide save statistics, unless you break them down into 1-run, 2-run, 3-run saves.  If a league average pitcher gives up 0.5 runs/inning (4.50 ERA)

Then his team should win
~75% ahead 1 run in the 9th (some times you will get a blown save and someone will vulture the win)

For a 3-run save it's probably like 90%.

winning 60% of you save situations doesn't seem right, unless you include games that are tied starting the 9th.

by zenbitz on Jun 23, 2006 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Word.  Scott Eyre was money against lefties and righties last year, but would often get pulled after effectively facing one batter.  Especially considering the rest of the shite in last year's bullpen, it boggled my mind that Eyre would be pulled and replaced by some other POS.

by Cleophus on Jun 23, 2006 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: I think that pulling a pitcher
Oh Scott Eyre is a case in point. Last season he'd be money one inning, then boom, where did he go??? Hawkins or worse yet Benitez or Herges was out there, or all of the above if Felipe was still awake and had the energy to do the whole lefty righty righty lefty thing... anyway, more often than not, if he had just left Eyre in for a few more batters the game would have been over and everyone would have been better off.

by Running on Jun 23, 2006 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Felipe
The problems with this team start at GM and go down from there. Sabes must go, Felipe must go, the team needs to stop paying good money for player past their primes and work on develpoing a farm system that produces more than pitchers.  

by Giant Dwarf on Jun 23, 2006 12:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sp-giants21_ph_t_0501991449_part6_small
The McCovey Chronicles Fantasy League, For Money.
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Who's In?
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Rules Discussion
Honus_wagner4_small
Hector & Gregor's Excellent Adventure (In the VWL)
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List: The Results

Recent FanPosts

T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – College Left Handed Pitchers
Img_0100_small
Cormac McCarthy novel The Road
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – HS Left handed pitchers
Small
Angel Villalona reported to have a work visa
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – The Catchers
Hidey-fern_small
Hiking on the 18th?
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot - The Shortstops

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant Brisbee

Moderators

Minime_small Natto

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Goofus_small Goofus

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Det_7193_small jponry

Authors

09_small JT Jordan

Small steve S