One Barry and a bunch of scrubs?
Sorry to pimp my own website again, but...
Article on lineup construction at Beyond the Boxscore, which talks about the relative benefits of having a Giants-type of lineup with one elite offensive player and a bunch of average ones as opposed to a "deep" lineup. Might be of interest to Giants fans.
as baseball fans, we often talk about consistency and balance, as if we recognize, even if dimly, that there is some sort of value in predictability. This manifests itself in a lot of ways, but there's one idea in particular that I am going investigate today.Let me ask you a question: would you rather have an offense of one premiere offensive player and a bunch of average hitters or a deep offense of above average hitters?
I'll be more specific. You can choose between these two lineups:
STAR AND SCRUBS EVEN STEVENS
1 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
2 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
3 Star 333/400/600 Steven 277/340/452
4 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
5 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
6 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
7 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
8 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
9 Scrub 270/333/433 Steven 277/340/452
Team averages: 277/340/452
(Stats are AVG/OBP/SLG)
Read it here.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Deep Sal
by WilbertR on Sep 23, 2005 3:26 PM PDT reply actions
.270/.333/.433?
The Scrubs
A more realistic way (and more time-intensive way) would be to calculated the league average 2B, 1B, LF, etc. For example, it would be more useful to have a superstar 2B than a superstar LF (unless he's Bonds). That would be a good exercise. Thanks for the suggestsions.




















